Home

Busheviks Wanted to Cut Money to Protect Us from Liquid Explosives!

Submitted by BuzzFlash on Sat, 08/12/2006 - 8:01am.

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS

As we've said before, when it comes to using fear to achieve political ends and consolidate power, the Bush Administration makes us feel like it's Groundhog Day everyday when they need some tyrannical law passed or election season is approaching.

So, in today's BuzzFlash stories, we have a number of examples of their latest efforts that are really from the same page of the same playbook that they have been using since 9/11: make the population fearful, make them think that only the Busheviks can save them, and then grab as much UnConstitutional power as Cheney and Bush can --and use fear to preserve a one-party state (you know, Soviet-style.)

In Saturday's headline line-up alone, you will see that the Bush Administration wants to use the latest alleged terror threat to:

-- achieve their UnConstitutional goals for Kafkaesque Gitmo trials that the Supreme ruled against the law.

-- make their illegal NSA spying and data mining on American citizens legal (shades of the East German Stasi secret police).

-- protect themselves retroactively for being tried for war crimes.

And what's more, they are even boasting about how they are going to use the alleged terrorist threat to achieve their goals.

There was an Agence France Press article earlier in the week describing White House aides as gleeful with the opportunities that the alleged British terrorist cell offers them to make political gains -- in dismantling the Constitution and keeping the Democrats from taking over either House of Congress.

The Bush Administration is basically treasonous. They thrive off of terror.

They couldn't govern or own any branch of government without the threat of terrorism. This is how demagogues and tyrants achieve full power, as Fujimori did in Peru and the mythical "Chancellor" does in the film "V."

Bin-Laden released a videotape a few days before the 2004 election to help Bush get elected. They need each other to build their power bases. We are the pawns in their game of achieving their personal political goals.

As we said -- and have said repeatedly -- since 9/11, everyone in the United States is against terrorism because they value their lives. So, the mere existence of terrorists doesn't in anyway justify the Bush Administration in power.

In fact, the Bush Administration has been singularly feckless in doing anything but putting up a "show" of trying to stop terrorism. They use terrorism to achieve their political goals, not their political power to try and stop terrorism.

You need look no further than the Associated Press story that "While the British terror suspects were hatching their plot, the Bush administration was quietly seeking permission to divert $6 million that was supposed to be spent this year developing new homeland explosives detection technology." The ineptness in battling REAL terrorism -- and the betrayal of America by the Bush Administration -- is mind boggling.

The battle for control of Congress is literally a matter of life and death. The continued unchallenged rule of the Busheviks, who only see terrorism as political opportunity while they strategically are completely criminally neglectful in dealing with it, presents a threat to all our lives.

As we noted the other day, the Democrats should brand a quotation of Richard Nixon -- of all people -- on their forehead. It is from his run for the presidency against the Johnson Administration (Hubert Humphrey) and the Vietnam War:

"Never has so much military and economic and diplomatic power been used so ineffectively, and if after all of this time, and all of this sacrifice, and all of this support, there is still no end in sight, then I say the time has come for the American people to turn to new leadership not tied to the mistakes and policies of the past."

Nixon's Madison Avenue consultants knew how to push back the Johnson Domino Theory and the fear it evoked in the midst of the Cold War.

The Democrats would be wise to take a lesson from Tricky Dick. On this quote (and his "secret plan to end the Vietnam War") he won the presidency.

The Democrats can't cower in fear and expect that people will consider them leaders. They have to lead Americans out of the land of the demagogues and into the land of truth and safety.

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS

Bookmark/Search this post with:
buzzflash buzzflash | delicious delicious | digg digg | technorati technorati
Technorati Tags:

» login or register to post comments | printer friendly version

Busheviks wanted to cut money ....

Submitted by BearCountry on Mon, 08/14/2006 - 9:02pm.
I know that it is not the common view, but these people are not inept. Their desire is to gain power that cannot be reversed without a full revolution. The goal is to drive the USA into third world status. There is no real need to maintain an educated workforce here because most everything can be outsourced to another country. What would be ineptness if they were actually trying to govern is a calculation to fail. The Busheviks hate us for our freedoms; they want to destroy the Constitution and roll back any government support for anyone except their wealthy cronies. This story of trying to divert the money is a perfect paradigm of their approach of phoney preaching about protecting us, but in actuality setting the stage for another attack that they will use to tighten their grip on the reins of government.
» login or register to post comments

How Conveeeeenient

Submitted by Blueneck on Sat, 08/12/2006 - 6:15pm.
Bush and Blair have known for some time about this "latest threat". That they chose to "unveil" this plot at this time smacks of oportunism. "Kissy-face" had just lost his primary, the anti-war message was resonating with the voters. The cabal was trying to pass retroactive legislation to cover their sorry asses and lo and behold! A terror plot uncovered! And just in time, too!! Like the Church Lady used to say, "How Conveeeeenient!" You can certainly tell the campaign season is in full swing. The terror alerts are blinking a furious orange -- or red. I am sure glad that we have those 150,000 troops in Iraq to protect us from those murderous Brits and their "sports drinks". I hope that the voters are not going to fall for the "all terror all the time" campaign again. Just remember that if Emmanuel Goldstein -- er, I mean Osama bin Laden ("1984" two minute hate, in case you didn't get the reference...)attacks this country and inflicts mass casualties again, this would prove the utter contempt that the BFEE has for this country and it's citizens -- and it's massively successful plan to "save" us by destroying our Democracy. "Fool me once, shame on... you. Fool me twice, we won't be fooled again."
» login or register to post comments

Slot Machine Mentality

Submitted by Soulsoup on Sat, 08/12/2006 - 5:46pm.
I have worked in the casino industry all my professional life. There are a few famous gambler fallacies the Repbulican rely on to scare people and get votes. Perception is greater than reality** There are no coincidences** Anecdotal = measurement** There are good and bad luck streaks** Near miss = almost hit** Everything has a pattern** Volatility = Inevitability** Intuition = Calculation** You can figure out the probability by looking at the outcome.** People will embrace the con, once they've fallen for the con
» login or register to post comments

Our Terrorized Nation

Submitted by vodvarka on Sat, 08/12/2006 - 10:10am.
As the latest chapter in our terror saga is written, this time with supposed liquid explosives, and the restrictions on air travel are once again ratcheted up, I can only wonder what the average American's sense of risk is. Hundreds of thousands of our fellow citizens each year die as a result of clear malpractice, but not many seem to be in a panic over this. More than twelve thousand were killed by firearms. It is infinitely more dangerous to take trip on the interstate highway system than to fly, in fact the probability of being killed by a terrorist on a plane is likely that of being struck by lightning. As far as I'm concerned, they can take these various colors of alerts and stuff them. They take us for cowardly fools and play us like fiddles. We can all live in dread of the day when some overblown security agency, in the attempt to justify its existence, overhears a bunch of drunks discussing the use of explosive anal suppositories as a possible weapon. Tony Vodvarka, Hartly DE
» login or register to post comments

Nixon looks good compared to what we have in place today

Submitted by sandy on signal on Sat, 08/12/2006 - 9:42am.
Things are really at the extreme when we begin to quote Nixon. I spoke with an older Republican gentleman on our primary day about how Nixon looks great compared to what is in the White House now. The Republican Gentleman commented he thought Clinton looks real good too, compared to this administration. Even in Tennessee, we can find common ground with the other side by bringing up how incompetent and reckless the new GOP is. We need to work on change together. Support Bill Lusk for Tennessee State Representative 27th District
» login or register to post comments

Seems obvious to me....

Submitted by winterfire on Sat, 08/12/2006 - 9:27am.
Seems obvious to me that the Bushites are doing all they can to make it easier for Al Qaeda, or whoever, to attack the U.S. Seems as though they are hoping for another hit on American soil.
» login or register to post comments

Obvious?

Submitted by orbitalman on Sat, 08/12/2006 - 10:54am.
>> Seems as though they are hoping for another hit on American soil. << That's right, WinterFire. And... so long as it doesn't point directly to them or it appears to point in another direction with yet another seemingly plausible made-up story.
» login or register to post comments

Al Qaeda? What Al Qaeda?

Submitted by Malgoska on Sat, 08/12/2006 - 9:46am.
I am beginning to believe that there IS NO AL QAEDA. It is all busheviks' work, from the beginning to the (as yet unknown) end. Busheviks staged the 9/11 attack. Busheviks invented Bin Laden. Busheviks made up al Zarqawi, and when they got in trouble, they killed him. Busheviks lied about WMD. Busheviks lied about capture of Hussein - not that he has not been captured, but HOW that happened. Busheviks keep lying and making up things, and gullible suckers previously known as resourceful, brave and smart Americans, are buying it all wholesale. When will it end?
» login or register to post comments

You have it right: There is no Al Qaeda...

Submitted by mattnet on Sat, 08/12/2006 - 6:16pm.
Malgoska got it right!

There is no al Qaeda... at least in the sense of an independent group capable of terrorist activity. Al Qaeda, to the extent it exists at all, is simply a troupe of patsies, basket cases mostly, who can be used to take the blame whenever the powers-that-be want to stage a fake terror event... just like on 9/11.

"All great truths begin as blasphemies." G.B.Shaw

9eleven.info
» login or register to post comments

Al Qaeda

Submitted by Big John on Sat, 08/12/2006 - 1:13pm.
I think you're right on all counts. It will only end when enough people say enough is enough. Stop the lies, stop the killing, stop the war! Get US out of Iraq, and anywhere else we're not welcome. I think terrorism would end if we change our policy. USA is not the worlds police force
» login or register to post comments

Speigel: London plot homegrown terrorists

Submitted by ETS on Sat, 08/12/2006 - 10:07am.

"Security experts close to the German government say the arrested suspects need to be viewed as "passionate amateurs." That's why the disaster averted in London can't be the "official" al-Qaida attack that some expect the terror network to stage on or around the fifth anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks. "As far as the delay in further attacks in the United States is concerned, the reason for that delay is not that your security measures are stopping us," Osama bin Laden threatened in one of his last speeches, in January 2006. He went on to claim that further attacks on US targets were being planned.

"Israeli al-Qaida expert Reuven Paz also suspects the would-be killers arrested in Britain belong to a "new generation of jihad-seekers," which has taken shape in recent years, especially since the murder of the Islam-critical Dutch film director Theo Van Gogh in Amsterdam. These new terrorists are typically "Islamic fundamentalists with a poor Islamic education, but a great deal of motivation for jihad in the sense of terrorism. They're not waiting for al-Qaida to recruit them. They initiate their own operations, in accordance with al-Qaida's strategy," Paz told SPIEGEL ONLINE: A lot of these potential killers reside in Europe, he assumes.

"Today's events suggest three things. First, the authorities are getting better at catching elusive members of the new generation of terrorists, at least towards the end of the planning stage. Second, even five years after September 11, Islamist fundamentalists are willing -- and able -- to target thousands of civilians. So the future may bring mainly "low key/low damage" attacks, which kill a relatively small number of people at a time. Of course, there will be larger-scale plots as well. They're more difficult to organize, but they still seem to exert considerable fascination for "homegrown terrorists." Third, of course: The threat posed by Islamist terrorism has more than one source."
"Terror Attack for Dummies," Yassin Musharbash

» login or register to post comments