Home

Inexplicable Fox News silence on bombshell DOJ politicization report

Submitted by AmyW on Tue, 07/29/2008 - 4:06pm.

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS
by Amy Weiss

Both Fox News and the White House press corps don't seem to have much interest in the report released Monday by the Justice Department's Offices of Inspector General and Professional Responsibility. It found that former DOJ White House Liaison Monica Goodling broke federal law in her hiring and promoting practices.

The report concluded that Goodling (and a other DOJ staffers) used political considerations when filling not just political positions but also career positions in the department. Civil Service laws stipulate that employers cannot discriminate based on political affiliations and views in the hiring process for career positions, while political positions are not subject to those same laws.

According to the report, Goodling prevented an extension of a U.S. attorney's detail position because she believed her to be a lesbian:

Both 28 C.F.R. Section 42.1(a) and standard OARM job announcements state that Department policy prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation. We concluded that Goodling's actions violated Department policy and federal law, and constituted misconduct.

Goodling also asked questions like "What is it about George W. Bush makes you want to serve him" "Why are you a Republican?" and "Aside from the President, give us an example of someone currently or recently in public service who you admire." (When one applicant said he admired Condoleezza Rice, Goodling "frowned" and said, "but she's pro-choice.")

The report concluded:

Goodling's use of political considerations in connection with these details was particularly damaging to the Department because it resulted in high-quality candidates for important details being rejected in favor of less-qualified candidates.
Fox News only devoted three sentences worth of daytime coverage to the report yesterday and had no mention of it during primetime. The White House press corps has not asked Press Secretary Dana Perino a question about it during a press briefing yet.

Goodling was granted immunity prior to her May 2007 testimony before Congress where she admitted to "crossing a line" with career position applicants so it is unclear what kind of legal action, if any, will be taken against her. Rep. John Conyers (D-MI), Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said in a press release following publication of the report:
The Report also indicates that Monica Goodling, Kyle Sampson, and Alberto Gonzales may have lied to the Congress about these matters. I have directed my staff to closely review this matter and to consider whether a criminal referral for perjury is needed.
Legal expert Jonathan Turley said on Countdown with Keith Olbermann Monday that he thinks this report serves as a preview of the report on the firing of nine U.S. Attorneys by then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' office for political reasons, which the Inspector General is still working on.

Justice investigators said Goodling and others may lose their law licenses. Goodling earned her law degree from Pat Robertson's Regent University, ranked by U.S. News and World Report as a "Tier 4" law school (the lowest tier in the report.) The Regent Law admissions Web page articulates its mission:
Regent Law School seeks to admit students who are serious about the critical roles they will assume as future counselors, conciliators, defenders of the faith, effective client advocates and followers of Christ ...

The personal statement gives the Admissions Committee insight into the student's motivation for studying law and reveals his or her desire to receive a legal education integrated with Christian principles. Regent Law seeks men and women who are dedicated to becoming Christian leaders who will change the world for Christ.

It would seem the legal philosophy Goodling was taught may be in violation of the Constitution she was hired to help protect (separation of church and state, anyone?) -- not surprising considering her ideological extremism and utter disregard for integrity. What is surprising, is that Fox News and White House reporters don't seem to notice. 

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS

Bookmark/Search this post with:
buzzflash buzzflash | delicious delicious | digg digg | yahoo yahoo | technorati technorati
Technorati Tags:

» login or register to post comments | printer friendly version

Only the most credulous

Submitted by sulphurdunn on Wed, 07/30/2008 - 7:47am.
Only the most credulous people in America would still assume the existence of MSM impartiality. There never was a golden age when there was. These are private corporations and so are their sponsors. Their main interest are deregulation, consolidation, lower taxation and higher profits, just like any other business. Even more credulous are those who think these outfits recognize any constitutional obligation to objectivity or truth. This is especially so now that their news divisions are expected to be as profitable as their reality shows.
» login or register to post comments

Now is the time

Submitted by blackjack on Wed, 07/30/2008 - 12:58am.
Now is the time that any DEMOCRATIC talking head that goes on any of the CORPORATE CONTROLED MEDIA like CNN, MSNBC, ABC,CBS, NBC, PBS, to really Let go about the REPUBLICANS and what they tried to do to the DOJ, but they will not all that I KEEP HEARING FROM THE DEMOCRATS IS MY FRIEND THIS OR MY FRIEND THAT. I am so sick of the DEMOCRATS saying MY FRIEND TO THE REPUBLICANS that IT is like NAILS on a BLACKBOARD every time I hear a DEMOCRAT say MY FRIEND to a REPUBLICAN.
» login or register to post comments

anyone other than the author find this INEXPLICABLE?

Submitted by codypup on Tue, 07/29/2008 - 9:57pm.
i can explic it right here ------------------ fux news motto "all the facts we feel like making up" sadly the talking heads dont even understand what they are doing to the morons who believe them ------------------ but don't worry... if there is a hell... there is a warm corner waiting for them
» login or register to post comments

'Inexplicable'...? No. Stone Silence 'obverse of Talking Pts

Submitted by kennethetucker on Tue, 07/29/2008 - 9:22pm.
Nothing 'inexplixable' about the 'silence' on any/every REAL news story that casts the admin in an unfavorable light. The obverse of scripted talking points is a whole lotta 'shut the fu*ck up'. One PISSED OFF Viet Vet ('72-'73)
» login or register to post comments

Inexplicable?

Submitted by SpikeHeels on Tue, 07/29/2008 - 6:09pm.
Don't all Faux News personnel report directly to the White House political office? Why would no mention of bad news be inexplicable?
» login or register to post comments

Attorneys Fired for not going along with the Crooks

Submitted by vitavicki on Tue, 07/29/2008 - 5:50pm.
None of the networks are going to keep this on their channels. I know MSNBC mentioned it and has brought it up on Dan Abrams program, but it is not being covered worth a darn otherwise.
» login or register to post comments

Olbermann's Already Mentioned This, As Mentioned Above

Submitted by drprodny on Tue, 07/29/2008 - 6:38pm.
So did Rachel Maddow, or she talked about something similar Ashcroft had done while he was AG - and now I can't find her story about it online. :(
» login or register to post comments

Is This a Surprise to Anyone?

Submitted by drprodny on Tue, 07/29/2008 - 5:19pm.
Of COURSE Faux Noize won't report any news that might suggest their cheerleading of The Traitors Bush/Cheney/Ashcroft/Gonzalez for the past eight years has ever been, in any way, WRONG.

As for the rest of the MSM, outside of pockets on MSNBC I suspect they're all too invested in the Bush Narrative to report the Truth - look at how CBS covered for McCain's gaffe on the Anbar Awakening last week....
» login or register to post comments