Bush’s Manifest Destiny: A White Man’s Burden

A BUZZFLASH EDITORIAL

Ample historical statements by American leaders – all white males – back up the theory that our nation’s westward expansion was due to a sense of divine or "manifest destiny."

That was true even for the first settlements. Manhattan was allegedly bought from Native Americans for $24.00 in trinkets, but the rest of the United States was seized primarily through conquest.

And the conquest was often bloody and unforgiving.

To most American government officials and settlers, the Native Americans were heathens to be subdued or annihilated. For many of the white immigrants to what became the United States, they were on a divine mission to tame the savages and bring "Christian civilization" to the land that lay before them.

Even though Native Americans occupied most of what became the United States, the land "belonged" to the Christian white man due to a "divine mandate" and "superior civilization."

And also, because the white men from Europe could win – pure and simple. They were victorious because God and military might were on their side, according to their thinking.

BuzzFlash recounts this brief summary of America’s historical expansion to the West because it is key to understanding George W. Bush.

Yes, he may have enormous psychiatric obstacles that don’t allow him to admit failure. He may have extreme personal intellectual limitations that don’t allow him to admit complexity. He may also have people like Dick Cheney and Karl Rove pulling his strings – and they have a variety of other motivations for U.S. policies in the Middle East

But for Bush, it is essential in understanding his sense of personal entitlement to realize that he embodies the arrogant "weight" of "the white man’s burden."

For him, the process of bringing "civilization" to the "dark skin heathens" -- ones who practice a "pagan" faith -- is the foundation of his certitude. Because if you remove that sense of "manifest destiny" from his "mission," nothing remains but utter, deluded, horrific failure.

And Bush cannot personally admit to failure, because it is only the certitude of his "mission" that allows him to dismiss the need to acknowledge reality.

Bush doesn’t know what victory looks like, smells like or acts like. He only knows that victory ends up being defined as not being perceived as losing.

Because a perceived "loss" means that his life-long sense of entitlement to power -- due to his lineage, color and religious beliefs – rests on nothing more than feet of clay.

For this delusion -- and our historical precedent as a nation -- our Gis and Iraqis are continuing to experience the horror of Iraq. What is happening in that nation now is the stuff of nightmares of mutilation and death.

A nation and a world are held hostage to one man’s fear that Iraq will be his "Custer’s Last Stand."

And it is beginning to look more and more as if that may indeed be the case.

A BUZZFLASH EDITORIAL

Technorati Tags:

All the Kings Horses

The forecast is the President will add more troops into Iraq, twenty or thirty thousand more, and where will they come from? Why we will just extend the tours of current soldiers reminiscent of Catch 22. In World War two however the soldiers knew point blank, you don’t go home until this is over. I wonder psychologically what the affect of telling men your going home in March then September then March again. I remember working at a place once where they would ask for workers on Saturday on Friday afternoon. If they’d just been honest and asked on Wednesday who can work Saturday?

I think there is still much misunderstood about the President, when this war began it was generally believed that he was but a pawn and that a powerful troika of ideologs controlled him. Then as the popularity of the war began to wane as each General would retire and come out in opposition to the war the lens began to focus in that this was in fact Bushes war and a very personal affair to boot.

But the November elections brought things even more into focus with the departure of Rumsfeld. Many assumed that this might be a sign that the President was amenable to a change of strategy and willing to work with the Democrats. But as Rumsfeld began to speak about his plans it appeared that it was the opposite that was true. Rumsfeld was speaking of a change in strategy, or was he lying? Or was he fired not as a political sacrifice but for disagreeing with the king?

The when the Iraq study group issued it’s report crafted by daddy’s hand picked henchman the President treated it with all the attention of a critique by Michael Moore.
Maybe the President didn’t understand that the Iraq study group was his chance to save face or maybe he doesn’t want to save face or maybe he doesn’t want to save face if daddy does it for him. Like a lost motorist he is unwilling to accept that he made a wrong turn he hopes to persevere down the wrong road hoping to connect with the right path eventually.

Here in is the problem, where was the mistake made? And can it ever be corrected by following the wrong road? If you swat a strange pit bull on the nose with a newspaper can your problem be corrected by swatting him again and yet again or will it just make the problem worse? Unlike the lost driver the damage has been done like Colin Powell’s now famous pottery barn analogy. We’ve grabbed a beehive from the tree we have two choices continue to be stung by it or drop it and run.

Neither choice is appealing, neither choice is politically popular but that’s where you end up when you refuse to follow the map or the people with more experience in how to get there. You find yourself painted into the corner with unpleasant choices to make. It is never easy for a politician to sound retreat and only those with the mettle of greatness can do it. Custer couldn’t do it, Nixon couldn’t do it but like most modern politicians he put a 1984 spin on it losing is winning Vietnmisation, we will stand down when the Iraqi’s stand up but it is all the same game were not winning but we are not losing either.

That statement by the President says more about the man than the situation it is akin to the lost driver claiming, we are not lost were taking a short cut. An obvious lie by a stubborn man unwilling to accept the truth, willing to continue down the wrong road rather than admit he’s lost and now he’s angry about it. The execution of Saddam during a holiday was more about Bush than Saddam as the stories of the Iraqis asking for more time. Imagine a Christian leader executed on Easter Sunday can anyone believe this was an Iraqi idea?

So now the plan is to add twenty to thirty thousand more troops to Iraq, I ask you if Col. Travis had twenty more men at the Alamo would it have changed the outcome? How about if Custer had fifty more men available would it have changed anything? During the Vietnam War the US had half a million troops in country and yet we couldn’t win would fifty thousand more have made any difference? So we’ve dropped the jug at the pottery barn are choices are run for it or pay for it and help sweep up.

We can’t just run for it they say, what about the poor Iraqi’s? Six hundred thousand dead and now they worry about the poor Iraqi’s When you’ve grabbed the beehive from the tree do you worry about the well being of the bees? Or is the true concern over not being able to get their honey if you let go? Neither choice allows us to keep the Iraqi honey and we have made commitments and contracts we have sold oil fields we don’t control let alone rightfully own. So it then becomes a question of pride, will the failed Texas oilman fail again? Or will he fight to the last drop of someone else’s blood to prove two or more wrongs can indeed make a right, and that you can indeed get to the right destination by the wrong road.

Despite His Absolute Certitude The Emperor Falls

As does his government. What in its place? That'll be up to us. . .

mailbag for Dec. 2, 2006

citizen one
You should allow feedback through your posting of comments of readers of your editorials and articles. This is a two-way street; you do not have a monopoly on views or knowledge. If I am talking to the wall in submitting comments and they are not posted, I will find a site that will honor their reader's comments. That should not be too hard to find. I have posted only two times but never see my comments in your mailbag. I assume that I'm not alone in this complaint.

Remember the Oil Always

There is one fact. They want to keep Iraqi oil off the market in order to keep the price of oil high. By pretending there is an oil shortage they can continue their obscene profits and still be defended by their sheeple.

So if you want to assume these people are indeed sane and just suffer from extreme huberis and greed.... well; all you have to remember is the OIL.

Draw your own conclusions.

There is the more sinister

There is the more sinister possibility that he isn't.

Perhaps he was expecting civil war, he had enough documentation saying such would be the case.
Perhaps he holds the Neo-Cons in as much contempt as he does anyone else and their aspirations for global democracy and greatness is such wild eyed dreaming

Then he appointed incompetents to FEMA for the purposes of killing the financially insecure when, not if, some "natural" disaster came about providing cover for his genocidal tendencies.

Then he appointed incompetents to the Department of Defence for purposes of inciting bloody civil strife wherever the Neo-Cons thought to start their great plan of civilizing the aborigines.

Then he appointed incompetents to the Treasury for the purposes of inciting hyper-inflation and starving the resource-insecure.

Every action he has ever taken, if he were cognisant of what he was doing, has been for the purposes of killing as many people as possible and providing himself legitimate cover. Every single department of the American government is advancing policies that will see a maximum number of people killed should any tragic event initiate a cascade calamity.

Yes, it'd be reassuring to think he was just a snide, vindictive idiot. He could not have achieved such ends in every department were this the case, those sane individuals that remain in his political proximity would mitigate his errors. It's more probable that he isn't, what a wonderful nightmare.

http://belligerant-socialisim.blogspot.com/

Okay - he's crazy

So anyone with the intelligence of a turnip knows bush is bent and doesn't have the ability to run a lemonade stand. So it took a country 6 years to figure this out.

This says one of two things, either we're that stupid too or the system is so corrupted it needs to be overthrown.

Is this is the rationale for irrational, prgrammed behavior?

"The white man's burden" does not make much sense if you think about it. The world's really old and stable civilizations, such as that of China, India, the Mayans have had a very different philosophy. They stake out some of the earth's prime real estate and when conquering bastards (like the white men of the famed "burden") come knocking at their door, they resist, or when resistance is not enough, the assimilitate.

I think it helps to go back a ways and look at the ecologic conditions that gave rise to the so called "white man". Northern Europe is a bread basket only because of the oh so fragile Gulf Stream that takes warm water and air to a far northern latitude and makes it habitable. People living there had to shed their skin pigment or develop rickets from lack of UV or sun exposure during the long winters.

The problem with Europe was that it was prone to lots of unpredictable weather fluctuations, even mini ice ages that sent those early white men scurrying south into North Africa over and over again. So, primitive white men had to become adapt at picking up,leaving their homes and stealing someone elses homes at a moments' notice--and calling it "divine mandate."

That is my theory anyway. This means that W. is just acting out his Neanderthal roots.

Chosen People

What you describe is not unique to the American people. The idea of a chosen race or people with a divine mission to subjugate or enlighten "others" is as old as history and has always been the moral justification for conquest. Its tenacious persistence and uselesness as a means of addressing the problems facing the modern world is troubling.

GREAT Right 2 the point, add this and lots of problums R solved

America Waking UP/DOWN/AROUND

yip-ie

" When Society Becomes An Addict "

by, Anne Wilson Schaff

( Harper & Row ) pub... ( 15 years ago )

after that see...

http://www.EarthBall.org

and

http://www.OneGlobalCommunity.com

both the above web sites need all our help...

Thank U, another Earth Citizen
.