What would you do if the presidential race came down to your vote?

It can be fun going through the video store, especially in the summertime, and check out cool classic political movies. At Oscar time last February, we asked you to name your all-time favorite political movie.

The one political movie this summer has an interesting story line, but from the reviews, doesn't shape up to be one of the all-time classics. But it could help pass 90 to 120 minutes of your life in a cool theatre on a hot summer day.

I am speaking of course about "Swing Vote," starring Kevin Costner. As imdb.com tell us:
Kevin Costner stars as Bud Johnson, an apathetic, beer slinging, lovable loser, who is coasting through a life that has passed him by, except for the one bright spot in his mundane existence, his precocious, over achieving twelve-year old daughter, Molly. She takes care of them both, until one mischievous moment on Election Day, when she accidentally sets off a chain of events which culminates in the presidential election coming down to one vote, her dad's.

Suddenly, Bud Johnson, the nobody, becomes the voice for everybody when the world realizes that his vote will be the one that elects the next president. Politicians invade the small town of Texico, New Mexico and its unwitting inhabitants, waging war for Bud's vote.
The world of "Swing Vote" according to Wikipedia:
Swing Vote deals with the story of an election set somewhere in the near future where Bud Johnson (Kevin Costner), a lovable loser, who is coasting through a life and has not a political thought in his head, is thrust into an improbable dilemma. Coaxed on by his 12-year-old daughter Molly (Madeline Carroll) to take more of a serious approach to life. Molly runs the household and sees an opportunity on election day to energize her father. The election is a "dead heat" with the winning ballot in the hands of a mystified Bud, who is being wooed by candidates from both sides.
It's tempting to have a process where the two major party candidates personally court one voter in the hopes of getting that person's support. But it also implies a scenario, a fake scenario, not so much based on the race in 2000, but on the premise of similarities between Bush and Gore. Some had that scenario based on apathetic, biased, and misleading coverage of the campaign.

Kelsey Grammar (the Republican incumbent) and Dennis Hopper (the Democratic challenger) are portrayed in the previews, at least, as being fairly similar. A choice between vanilla ice cream and French vanilla ice cream can be difficult. But Bush-Gore, Bush-Kerry, and now McCain-Obama, in the eyes of those who are knowledgeable, is a choice between custard (extra-rich ice cream) and a dry popsicle stick.

But if it takes a movie, especially a Kevin Costner movie, to show the American people the importance of one single vote, then this Hollywood exercise could be worthwhile. The daughter in this story, played by newcomer Madeline Carroll, is the true hero: she registers him to vote and drags him to the polls.

The plot twist question that confused me in the previews: doesn't Costner know who he was going to vote for when his vote doesn't count. I won't spoil it for you - I haven't seen the movie, but I read how they work around that. But it does mean that he goes into the crux of the movie with a completely open mind.

Now assumingly Grammar's character has been president for at least 4 years, so there must be some impact on the life of Costner's character during that time. Apparently not. And perhaps Hopper's character didn't come out of nowhere, so Costner might have some idea, even if it's a false impression. Apparently not.

Nathan Lane and Stanley Tucci play the campaign advisors. And they seem to be crucial in the courting process - or so it seems from the previews. But Grammar or Hopper will be president, not Lane or Tucci.

A true political thriller would also offer other presidential candidates as an option, giving Costner's character a chance to vote for a third-party candidate or a write-in candidate, and throw the race into the House of Representatives. Or send a message but voting for himself or writing in "None of the Above." But this is Hollywood, and I can assure you that won't be an option in the movie.

As a journalism exercise, and because it might be fun, I will sacrifice 90-120 minutes of my weekend so I can come back on Monday and tell you what I thought.

But you can share with us what you think. If you had the opportunity to be in Costner's shoes, what would you make the presidential candidates do to prove their interest in your vote? Be creative and not too humiliating in the process. Technorati Tags:

Conversation

Of course I would vote for Obama. But first, I would like to have a conversation about domestic terrorism--namely the animal 'rights' groups that are busily fire bombing the homes and cars of California researchers. The Democratic Party, for some stupid reason, feels that it should support these maniacs. Even thought they are as opposed to scientific progress as any fundamentalist, even though they are as misinformed as any Neo-Con. There are groups of sane people who love and understand animals. These groups are supporters of animal WELFARE and the difference is very important. So before casing my vote for Obama, I would attempt to enlighten him and the Democratic Party about the dangerous and insane animal rights terrorists that they appear to embrace.

vanilla vs, French vanilla

If it came down to my vote making the final decision, I would call a press conference after voting to discuss the differences between the two polical parties and between the two candidates. I would explain how BOTH parties have forgotten about the citizens they're suppose to represent and have become corrupt. I would shame the democrats for not taking a strong stand for unions, civil rights, medical insurance for all, for refusing to take on Big Business and rein them in over the years. I would tell them how disgusted I am that the democrats have lost the New Deal/JFK agenda of making this country the best damn country to live in, and have allowed these values to be watered down. For the republicans, I would shame them for being some of the greediest, self-centered bunch of charracters this nation has ever seen! I would let them know what hypocrites they are and how they, too, have lost the values of their party ever since Reagan entered the White House. I would then explain what a sad day it truely is when the election comes down to ONE person's vote to determine the winner. Because, it means that Americans see little difference between the candidates and are voting for frivilious things as: Wanting to drink a beer with him/her or liking the color of his/her hair - POOR reasons to be voting for someone! I would then address the media and ask why they continue to refuse to report newsworthy events and insist on keeping the public ill-informed of what's REALLY going on. I would conclude my soapbox speech by stating that the time has come for third parties to be giving equal coverage and the right to rein in the White House. When asked who I voted for, I would slip a piece of paper with the candidate's name on it and state, "that I wanted to make sure my vote was counted correctly so they should match up my paper vote with that of the machine."

Not too hard.

I'd vote for the candidate that promises to have the Justice Dept indict the Republican Party under RICO statutes.

Candidates differences

War is one of the biggest issues in the campaign, and guess what? Obama and McCain are real close together, except for Iran which is beyond the cabability of the US these days.

How would I vote - Guess?

I would vote for Barack Obama to become our 44th President. I would then be exceedingly happy with the outcome. I love these easy questions.