Facebook Slider


Optional Member Code
Get News Alerts!
Wednesday, 19 September 2012 08:33

Romney's Libya Tantrum Represents a Foreign Policy That Is Dangerous to Peace

  • font size decrease font size decrease font size increase font size increase font size
  • Print
  • Email


Mitt Romney responded to the recent Cairo events with an apology frame. America, he said, must never apologize for its values, and he claimed that the Obama administration was apologizing when it pointed out a moral constraint on free speech.

blue book

Click here to continue reading.

"Romney’s framing of the events goes far beyond an attempt to score political points in the midst of a national tragedy. It is intended to strengthen extreme conservative beliefs about American foreign policy. Why no apologies? Because America, operating under conservative ideology, is seen as the world’s ultimate legitimate authority, whose actions define what is right. Therefore, there should be no need to apologize for doing what is right, and since that authority must be maintained, it would be wrong to apologize even if an apology were warranted. Even operating diplomatically, with real mutual respect, would be showing weakness by giving up the authority that should be maintained in all negotiations. That is a view that poses a real danger to peace both in the US and abroad."

George Lakoff and Elisabeth Wehling are authors of "The Little Blue Book: The Essential Guide to Thinking and Talking Democratic"