Guest Commentary (5253)
ECOWATCH FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUTLORRAINE CHOW OF
Article reprinted with permission from EcoWatch
The animals -- also known as "hoiho" in Māori -- are known as the world's rarest penguins and are only found in New Zealand.
Only 14 nests were found on the island compared to 24 last year, the survey from the Department of Conservation revealed. Since the island is predator-free with limited human access, terrestrial influences are unlikely to be the cause, the department pointed out.
JOHN GEYMAN, MD FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
An under-appreciated time bomb of block grants to states for Medicaid and other safety net programs is a constant thread within budget plans going forward in Congress and the Trump administration. This is likely to happen soon and have big impacts on the 75 million Americans now covered by Medicaid, many of whom gained this coverage as residents of the 31 states that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
As we know, the GOP tax plan that will probably emerge will give huge benefits to corporations and the wealthiest top 10 percent at the expense of the middle class. It will increase the federal deficit by some $1.5 trillion and lead to an attempt to make up that deficit by cutbacks in such "entitlement" programs as Medicare and Medicaid. A convenient way of doing this for Medicaid will be to give block grants to states with the unproven assumption that they can better design and manage their Medicaid programs with more flexibility -- and less federal money! If the costs of state programs exceed their budgets, it will be up to them to make up the difference.
An analysis by Avalere Health has shown that the federal government could save about $150 billion over the next five years through these per capita block grants. Any such savings would be on the backs of the most vulnerable among us.
Let's look at how these block grants will actually work to better understand what their impacts will be on vulnerable low-income Americans and safety net programs across the country.
BILL BERKOWITZ FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
After he's finished with the sullied campaign of Alabama's Roy Moore, will Steve Bannon's next project be the Senatorial campaign of Erik Prince, the founder of the notorious Blackwater security firm, or as Esquire's Charles P. Pierce characterized the company, the Blackwater "murder gang"?
In early October, The New York Times reported that Prince, a frequent Breitbart radio guest, is seriously considering and "appears increasingly likely" to stage a primary challenge to Wyoming Republican Senator John Barasso, "a senior member of the Senate Republican leadership." And Bannon, the anti-establishment-candidate-whisperer is pledging his support, and perhaps he'll be able to bring along financial support from Robert Mercer and his daughter Rebekah.
As The New York Times' Jeremy W. Peters, Maggie Haberman and Glenn Thrush reported, Prince, the brother of education secretary Betsy DeVos, "who has never run for public office, has been a polarizing figure for years, as Blackwater faced a welter of ethical and legal problems over its work for the military in places like Iraq, including an episode in 2007 in which its employees killed 17 civilians in Baghdad."
According to Salon's Heather Digby Parton, "Prince has been under investigation by the government for money laundering and attempts to broker his mercenary services to foreign governments."
LORRAINE CHOW OF ECOWATCH ON BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
State regulators expressed concern that the Nov. 16 spill in Marshall County was not the first from the controversial pipeline.
"This is a relatively new pipeline. It is supposed to have an operating life of more than 100 years and it was supposed to be a state-of-the-art pipeline construction. It appears that it is not," South Dakota Public Utilities Commission (PUC) member Gary Hanson told Aberdeen News.
"We've had three fairly major leaks just on the border with North Dakota and two in South Dakota in a very short period of time," Hanson added. "One might expect this to take place on a pipeline over a period of 30 or 40 years at the maximum, yet it's been fewer than 10 years."
KATHY KELLY FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
During the spring of 1999, as part of Voices in the Wilderness's campaign to end indiscriminately lethal U.S./U.N. economic sanctions against Iraq, the Fellowship of Reconciliation arranged for two Nobel Peace laureates, Adolfo Perez Esquivel and Mairead Maguire, to visit the country. Before their travel, Voices activists helped organize meetings for them with a range of ordinary Iraqis affected by an economic warfare targeting the most vulnerable: the elderly, the sick, and most tragically of all, the children. Perez Esquivel studied the itinerary. His voice and face showed clear disappointment. "Yes," he said, shaking his head, "but when do we meet with the teenagers?" He advised to always learn from a region's young people, and seek clear, inquisitive views not yet hardened by propaganda. We quickly arranged for Maguire and Perez Esquivel to meet with young women at Baghdad's Dijla Secondary School for Girls.
It was the spring of 1999. After eight years of deadly economic sanctions, the 2003 U.S. invasion was still the haziest of looming future threats. I was there with them at the school, and I remember Layla standing up and raising her voice. "You come and you say, you will do, you will do. But nothing changes. Me, I am sixteen. Can you tell me, what is the difference between me, I am sixteen, and someone who is sixteen in your country? I'll tell you. Our emotions are frozen. We cannot feel." But then she sat down and cried.
Other Iraqi students wondered what their country had done to deserve this treatment. What would happen to them if the UN said Iraq's foreign policy directly contributed to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of children, in another country, under age five? "Who are the criminals?" they asked.
MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
If you are free from November 29 to December 1, you can attend the "Future Ground Combat Vehicles: Delivering Cutting Edge Solutions for Mechanized Modernization" in Detroit. It's being run by the Institute for Defense and Government Advancement, which profits from putting on military-industrial conference "trade" shows that focus on weaponry and combat paraphernalia. However, it won't be cheap: The cost for "vendors, consultants and solution providers" is $2,160 for a three-day all-access pass.
You're in luck, nevertheless, if you work for the military or government, because there is "no cost to all military and government employees" who wish to attend. This is generally the case in the invitations for such military and weapons-focused conferences. Why? Because the purpose is to attract vendors who are buying access to intermingle with current and past military personnel who might give corporations an edge on contracts. The military does nothing to discourage its staff from participating in such conferences. Why should it? After all, both sides of the military-industrial complex work together to expand the supply and demand for weaponry, combat gear and the infrastructure of state violence.
This year, the featured speaker at this conference is an Army commander, according tothe conference brochure:
General Robert B. "Abe" Abrams assumed duties as the 22nd Commander of United States Army Forces Command, at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, on 10 August 2015. As Commander of the United States Army's largest organization, he commands 229,000 active duty Soldiers, and provides training and readiness oversight of U.S. Army National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve units. In total, the Forces Command team includes 776,000 Soldiers and 96,000 Civilians. Prior to his current command, he was the Senior Military Assistant to the Secretary of Defense.
Abrams is accompanied by a plethora of active military officer faculty, a retired brigadier general from Israel and three corporate speakers. This abundance of senior and project manager military personnel ensures that vendors can make key contacts for future military projects.
LORRAINE CHOW OF ECOWATCH ON BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
climate change can be a tough pill to swallow.As someone who writes about the environment on a near-daily basis, the fact that a large chunk of Americans (about one in eight) reject the near scientific consensus of
But after a year of record-breaking heatwaves, massive wildfires in the west, and a string of destructive hurricanes, it appears that my fellow U.S. citizens are waking up to the realities of our hot, new world, according to the latest nationally representative survey from the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication and the George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication.
The poll, which has tracked Americans' attitudes about climate since 2008, revealed an uptick in Americans' concern about climate change, including "substantial increases" in the certainty that the global phenomenon is happening and currently harming people in the U.S.
The survey, based on the replies of 1,304 adults between Oct. 20 to Nov. 1, showed that seven in ten participants think climate change is happening—an increase of eight percentage points since March 2015. The good news is that those who think global warming is real outnumber climate deniers by more than 5 to 1.
JIM HIGHTOWER ON BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
"We've had a great relationship," exulted a giddy Donald Trump, following his two-day schmoozefest in Manila with the thuggish president of the Philippines, Rodrigo Duterte.
Duterte, a self-styled "toughie" who boasts of personally killing many people and who likes to compare himself to Satan, has been on a murderous rampage since his election last year. In the name of eliminating drugs, he has unleashed a massive military assault across the country, not merely targeting dealers, but also anyone using drugs. His onslaught against his own people is a human rights atrocity, with untold thousands essentially being executed in what are antiseptically termed "extrajudicial killings" — ie, illegal, unjustified... murderous.
Yet, the present President of the United States says Duterte is his new buddy, and Trump stressed in their official discussions that the Philippine president can count on him and the U.S. (which includes you and me) to be a friend. And, as a friend, Trump didn't bother his authoritarian buddy with any unpleasant talk about those rampant human rights abuses.
Instead, the Duterte-Trump get-together was one of mutual praise and even affection. Indeed, Donald was delighted when Rodrigo impulsively grabbed the microphone at a gala state dinner and serenaded Trump with a love ballad: "You are the love I've been waiting for," he crooned.
BILL BERKOWITZ FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
This is being written before a final vote has been taken on President Trump's higher-taxes-for-the-middle-class-and-the-poor bill has been voted on, so as of now, there hasn't been much in the way of legislation for the Trump administration to hang its hat on. But downstream, there are lots of awful things underway. To paraphrase an old Henny Youngman tag line: Take the work of Education Secretary Betsy DeVos. … Please!
In her first few months as secretary, the Michigan billionaire, DeVos, who needed the vote of vice-president Mike Pence to break the tie in the Senate over her confirmation, has been involved in several controversial battles over the implementation of the Every Student Succeeds Act, Title IX, guns in the schools, rolling back regulations on the for-profit college industry, and her efforts to shrink the Dept. of Education.
According to The Washington Post's Moriah Balingit and Danielle Douglas-Gabriel, "The department's workforce has shrunk under … DeVos, who has said she wants to decrease the federal government's role in education, including investigations and enforcement of civil rights in schools. In all, the department has shed about 350 workers since December — nearly 8 percent of its staff — including political appointees. With buyouts offered to 255 employees in recent days, DeVos hopes to show even more staff the door."
PAUL BUCHHEIT FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Inequality, like a malignant tumor, is growing out of control, and the only response from Congress is to make it even worse. Those at the richest end of the nation seem to have lost all capacity for understanding the meaning and values of an interdependent society. They've convinced themselves that they deserve their passively accumulated windfalls, and that poorer people have only themselves to blame for their own misfortunes.
It's Getting Uglier Every Year
The average 1% household made nearly $2.6 million in the 12 months to mid-2017. Mostly from the stock market. Here's how:
- The U.S. increased its wealth by over $8.5 trillion (see Table 2-4, mid-2016 to mid-2017).
- The 1% took $3.27 trillion of that (38.3 percent: see Table 6-5).
- Each of 1.26 million households, on average, took nearly $2.6 million. In greater detail, the poor segment of the 1% averaged about $1.44 million for the year, the .1% averaged about $7.2 million, and the .01% (12,600 households) averaged nearly $65 million in just the past year.
BILL BERKOWITZ FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
To be perfectly honest, most of us would be hard-pressed to have a handle on the range of the myriad of functions of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. We would likely get the part about meat and poultry inspections, and maybe the fact that the agency oversees the food stamp program, but otherwise we would be pretty unclear about the scope of the agency's work. As Michael Lewis reports in the December issue of Vanity Fair, most of what the USDA does "has little to do with agriculture," as it spends only a "small fraction" of its $164 billion budget (2016) on farmers.
Among other things, the USDA "runs 193 million acres of natural forest and grasslands [and] It is charged with inspecting almost all the animals people eat." The agency runs a "massive science program; a bank with $220 billion in assets; plus a large fleet of aircraft for firefighting," There's more; it finances and manages numerous programs in rural America, "including the free school lunch for kids living near the poverty line."
A Vanity Fair USDA Organizational Chart has the Secretary and Deputy Secretary up top, and seven Undersecretaries: National Resources and Environment; Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services; Rural Development; Food, Nutrition, and Consumer Services; Food Safety; Research, Education and Economics (Science); and, Marketing and Regulatory Programs.
MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
In a November 7 article in The New York Times by Max Fisher and Josh Keller, the two reporters reflect upon the somber phenomenon of mass shootings in the United States. Faced with an unrelenting occurrence of such incidents, they attempt to ascertain the enabling circumstances for such atrocities. They conclude,
The only variable that can explain the high rate of mass shootings in America is its astronomical number of guns.
The top-line numbers suggest a correlation that, on further investigation, grows only clearer.
Americans make up about 4.4 percent of the global population but own 42 percent of the world’s guns. From 1966 to 2012, 31 percent of the gunmen in mass shootings worldwide were American, according to a 2015 study by Adam Lankford, a professor at the University of Alabama.
One must be wary of assessments that attribute a complex problem to only one factor, as this one does. However, the United States has 4.4 percent of the world population but 42 percent of the world's guns.
EMILY YATES FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Imagine you're being forced to flee your home. Not just your home, but your country, and not just for now, but forever.
Imagine you can only pack one carry-on sized bag, weighing no more than 50 pounds, from which you must rebuild your entire life. Everything else stays behind.
Imagine getting to your new, foreign home, only to discover that your funds are nowhere near enough to live on, your education and work skills don't translate into a local job, and you're immediately in debt to the government for the flight that brought you to safety. You have no health care, the culture you're now immersed in is entirely unfamiliar to you and every day is a struggle to adjust to a life you never thought you'd be living.
Now imagine the reason you must do this is because the United States military invaded and occupied your country, and instead of resisting, you chose to assist.
ROBERT C. KOEHLER FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Things fall apart, the center cannot hold . . .
The "man's world" I grew up in is shattering into fragments of shame, contrition and desperate denial. Allegations of sexual harassment and abuse are catching up with powerful perps, sometimes decades after the fact. On Capitol Hill, we now know about a "creep list." Women shouldn't ride alone in an elevator with these guys. This is our democracy.
The only real surprise in all this is that suddenly it matters . . . that women -- as well as young males, children of both genders -- were harassed, humiliated, raped by powerful male adults: that "me too" resonates in the news. At one time, outright denial of a sexual abuse allegation wasn't even necessary because, even if it were true, so what? That was then. The idea of "a man's world" was solid and, well, boys will be boys.