BILL BERKOWITZ FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
If Hillary Clinton wins the presidency, one thing is for sure, the Hillary-Bashing Industrial Complex will not fade away. It remains to be seen what form the opposition will take: whether it takes the form of John McCain’s pledge – should he win re-election -- that a Republican-controlled Senate will not approve any of her Supreme Court nominees; or, a House-led crusade, led by Speaker Paul Ryan, to privatize Social Security and Medicare; or, leaders of the Christian Right, alt-right, white supremacist right, and anti-immigrant right, organizing to challenge Clinton’s agenda. And, opposition will likely not be a right-wing-only affair, as a fair number of progressives are also champing at the bit to confront Clinton’s policy proposals.
Should Hillary Clinton be elected, progressives will face an existential dilemma: How to become effective thorns in the side of Hillary Clinton, without nullifying their voices by becoming auto-reflexive naysayers. Should they compile binders of WikiLeaks to use as cudgels, or prepare binders of progressive proposals to move on? Will Hillary have a honeymoon with progressives, or merely a one-night stand?
For progressives, what does being a thorn in the side of a Clinton administration look like? Does it mean opposing every effort she might make at working with Republicans? Does it mean opposing all appointments for cabinet positions? Does it mean continuing to pillory her as a stooge of Wall Street, an enemy of the people, at every opportunity? Does it mean filling up oodles of Facebook space with critical articles, WikiLeaks posts, tweets and scuttlebutt?
How might principled progressives go about creating an effective voice and counterbalance to Clinton’s center/center-right initiatives?
ROBERT C. KOEHLER FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
World War II never quite ended — it morphed.
Today we call it the status quo, or endless war, or we just don’t bother to notice it. Indeed, now more than ever we don’t notice it. It’s barely part of the 2016 election, even though we’re engaged in active conflict in half a dozen countries, toying with a relaunch of the Cold War with Russia and, of course, hemorrhaging, as always, more than half our annual discretionary budget on “defense.”
World War II has been going on for seven decades now and has no intention of ever stopping . . . of its own volition. But this year’s rocking electoral craziness — not just Hurricane Donald, but the unexpected staying power of the Bernie Sanders campaign — may well be the harbinger of transcendence. Apparently there’s another force in the universe capable of standing up to the American, indeed, the global, military-industrial status quo.
Slowly, slowly this force is organizing itself and taking human shape. This isn’t a simple process. After all, the game of empire — the game called war, the game of domination — has been coalescing political power for several thousand years now.
But our current military budget was birthed by the wars of the 20th century. William Hartung, writing recently at TomDispatch, shows the fascinating connectedness of the wars that followed VE and VJ Days, as the corporate beneficiaries of the Big War aligned with mainstream politicians of both major parties and coalesced into the Washington consensus. Over the decades they have engaged in an ongoing struggle to maintain military spending at breathtakingly high levels and avoid any sort of transition to something called peace.
LORRAINE CHOW OF ECOWATCH ON BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
another study has determined that hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, might be a major public health threat. In one of the most exhaustive reviews to date, researchers from the Yale School of Public Health have confirmed that many of the chemicals involved and released by the controversial drilling process can be linked to cancer.Yet
"Previous studies have examined the carcinogenicity of more selective lists of chemicals," lead author Nicole Deziel, Ph.D., assistant professor explained to the school. "To our knowledge, our analysis represents the most expansive review of carcinogenicity of hydraulic fracturing-related chemicals in the published literature."
For the study, published in Science of the Total Environment, the researchers assessed the carcinogenicity of 1,177 water pollutants and 143 air pollutants released by the fracking process and from fracking wastewater. They found that 55 unique chemicals could be classified as known, probable or possible human carcinogens. They also specifically identified 20 compounds that had evidence of leukemia/lymphoma risk.
One of the scarier parts from this study is that the researchers could not completely unpack the health hazards of fracking's entire chemical cocktail. More than 80 percent of the chemicals lacked sufficient data on cancer-causing potential, "highlighting an important knowledge gap," the school noted.
The unconventional drilling rush in the U.S. has expanded to as many as 30 states, spelling major consequences to the air we breathe and the water we drink. The Wall Street Journal reported in 2013 that more than 15 million Americans lived within a mile of a well.
WALTER BRASCH FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
My wife, Rosemary, a registered Republican, received a black and white poll in the mail. Plastered across the top of the sheet in bold black letters was the title: “MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.” I wonder who that could be.
On to the questions. All she had to do was to check the appropriate box and return the ballot. The survey indicated name, survey number, and a processing code, all with a bar code for identification. She just had to check the appropriate box beneath a picture of Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, or “no opinion.” Seemed simple enough.
First question: “Hillary Clinton is working hard to win the White House so she can carry forward Barack Obama’s disastrous policies—including increased taxes—which have been so harmful to our nation’s economy. Donald Trump is dedicated to lowering taxes and instituting responsible reforms that will create jobs, strengthen free enterprise and boost economic growth. Which candidate do you trust more to put America on a secure and prosperous economic path.”
Gee, this is a hard one. Let’s think about it awhile. OK, time’s up. I guess, based upon the question, the demon Clinton wasn’t the right answer. Rosemary needed to check Trump as the one to keep the country moving forward.
There were nine questions, all similar to the first one. The other questions had to do with the federal debt, foreign policy, the nomination of federal judges, immigration, environment, and ObamaCare. The ninth one asked the most vital question: “Are you willing to financially help the Trump Make America Great Again Committee in making sure our nation finally leaves behind the ruinous policies of the past eight years and elects a Republican president who will Make America Great Again?”
PAUL BUCHHEIT FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
review identified the "Three Big Sins of Charter Schools": fraud, a lack of transparency, and the exclusion of unwanted students. The evidence against charters continues to grow. Yet except for its reporting on a few egregious examples of charter malfeasance and failure, the mainstream media continues to echo the sentiments of privatization-loving billionaires who believe their wealth somehow equates to educational wisdom.
The Wall Street Journal, in its misinformed way, says that the turnaround of public schools requires "increasing options for parents, from magnet to charter schools." Wrong. As the NAACP affirms, our nation needs "free, high-quality, fully and equitably-funded public education for all children." For all children, not just a select few.
The NAACP has called for a moratorium on charter schools. And Diane Ravitch makes a crucial point: "Would [corporate reformers] still be able to call themselves leaders of the civil rights issue of our time if the NAACP disagreed with their aggressive efforts to privatize public schools?"
Here are the four big sins of charter schools, updated by a surge of new evidence:
ROBERT C. KOEHLER FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Maybe it's the phrase — "commander in chief" — that best captures the transcendent absurdity and unaddressed horrors of the 2016 election season and the business as usual that will follow.
I don't want to elect anyone commander in chief: not the xenophobic misogynist and egomaniac, not the Henry Kissinger acolyte and Libya hawk. The big hole in this democracy is not the candidates; it's the bedrock, founding belief that the rest of the world is our potential enemy, that war with someone is always inevitable and only a strong military will keep us safe.
In a million ways, we've outgrown this concept, or been pushed beyond it by awareness of global human connectedness and the shared planetary risk of eco-collapse. So whenever I hear someone in the media bring "commander in chief" into the discussion — always superficially and without question — what I hear is boys playing war. Yes, we wage war in a real way as well, but when the public is invited to participate in the process by selecting its next commander in chief, this is pretend war at its most surreal: all glory and greatness and hammering ISIS in Mosul.
"What about our safety here?" Brian Williams asked Gen. Barry McCaffrey on MSNBC the other night, as they were discussing the awfulness of terrorism and the need to bomb the bad guys out of existence. I cringed. How long can they keep selling this?
Our safety is far, far more imperiled by the fact that we have a military at all than by any enemy that military is allegedly fighting, but is, in fact, creating as it churns out endless collateral damage, a.k.a., dead and injured civilians.
DAN ZUKOWSKI OF ECOWATCH ON BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
The king tide occurs when a full moon is aligned with the Earth and sun, exerting gravitational forces that are exacerbated by the naturally-occurring high tides. As sea levels around Florida have risen, these king tides have become regular flooding events.
Rubio argued for an "all-of-the-above" energy strategy, including oil, coal, natural gas and nuclear energy, and said he favored mitigation strategies, "if in fact sea levels are rising."
Patrick Murphy, Rubio's Democratic challenger, responded in the debate by saying, "Look out your window, right? There's two or three inches of saltwater on the roads right now. They were not built underwater. Go down to the Florida Keys. The reefs are dying from acidification and bleaching."
Some 76 percent of Florida's population resides in coastal communities—regions that are highly vulnerable to storm surges, high tides, rising waters and hurricanes. According to a 2010 report prepared by the Florida Oceans and Coastal Council, "Much of the current infrastructure of coastal Florida will need to be replaced or improved during ongoing sea-level rise." The report puts the cost at $3 trillion by 2030.
BILL BERKOWITZ FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
They're stoked by bitterness, anger, and the unbearable color of others, and they're buying into Donald Trump's trope that the election, indeed society, is rigged against them. At his rallies, they love to wear obscene-laced t-shirts, and when Hillary Clinton's name is mentioned, they come alive with chants of "Lock her up." They revile fact checking and are disgusted, not by Trump's predatory behavior and despicable comments about women, but by the way the media has reported it. And, when the election is over, and Trump has moved on to attempting to build a multi-media empire, or perhaps to an all-expenses-paid Dacha in the Russian countryside, his supporters will be holding a bag of steaming anger.
And the anger of those supporters could make the era of the Tea Party look like, well … a tea party.
A question being batted around these days is: How will the Republican Party deal with its far-right extremists; white nationalists, neo-Nazis, and alt-righters if Trump loses? How will it reckon with the theocratic Christian Right, many of whom – Jerry Falwell, Jr., Dr. James Dobson, Ralph Reed, Tony Perkins, to name a few – were all in with their support for Trump, when they start clamoring for an authentic conservative Christian evangelical candidate in 2020?
In 2013, the Republican Party earnestly issued what was characterized as an "autopsy"; an examination of what wrong in the 2012 presidential election. Party analysts looked at why they lost, and what could be done differently. One of the areas the autopsy focused on was how to improve outreach to minority communities: "We need to campaign among Hispanic, black, Asian, and gay Americans and demonstrate we care about them, too." Questions about how the GOP could become a more inclusive party were asked and discussed.
BILL BERKOWITZ FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
As Donald Trump and his white nationalist/alt-right supporters stir up his base with anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim rhetoric, threats of anti-Muslim violence has been on the rise. Which brings us to Kansas, where some militia members are acting out. I wouldn’t call them good old boys because that can be a term of endearment. Besides, they're not really boys, all being in their late forties.
The guys, Curtis Allen, 49, Gavin Wright, 49, and Patrick Stein, 47, apparently decided it was time to take it big time to some Somali immigrants in the town of Garden City, Kansas. Garden City, located in southwestern Kansas, is the county seat of Finney County, and has a population of something over 25,000 people. In addition to Somali immigrants, Garden City is also home to Mexican-Americans, Vietnamese and other Southeast Asians, many of whom work at the Tyson Foods meat packing plant, located about five miles from the city, and other meat packing factories.
From once having a girlfriend working at a meat packing plant in Emporia, Kansas, I know that it's a really tough job: Tough on the hands, tough on the feet, and if you're working the night shift tough on family life.
Allen and Wright, both of Liberal, Kansas, and Stein, of Wright, Kansas are all members of a small "militia" group called the Crusaders, which may be aligned with the “sovereign citizens” movement. They wanted to “wake people up.” And the best way they thought of doing that was to bomb the guck out of an apartment complex that perhaps as many as 120 Somalis live at. And, since one of the apartments in the complex doubled as a mosque, they figured they'd have a mosque notched onto their resume.
All of the planning took place while stalking the apartment complex. Only they weren't very discreet, as they'd drive by and scream at Somali women in traditional clothing, calling them “fucking raghead bitches.”
They set the date; the day after Election Day. They wanted to be sure that their action would not affect the election.
PAUL BUCHHEIT FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
blurted out "that makes me smart" as a reason for non-payment of taxes, he was revealing a truth about the American narcissist. Senator Lindsey Graham was equally arrogant when he stated, "It's really American to avoid paying taxes, legally...It's a game we play.." The game has become very popular, with an incomprehensible three-quarters of Fortune 500 companies stashing profits in offshore tax havens, avoiding over $700 billion in U.S. taxes.
Who Are the Narcissists?
They're people who don't feel any responsibility to the society that made them rich, largely because they believe in the "self-made" myth. Their numbers are growing. For every 100 households with $100 million in assets in 2010, there are now 160.
Some of the super-rich care about average Americans, and some are well-intentioned philanthropists, but in general, as numerous studies have shown, wealthier individuals tend to be imbued with a distinct sense of entitlement. They believe their talents and attributes - genius, even - have earned them a rightful position of status over everyone else.
The narcissists care less about the feelings and needs of others, they become anti-social, they are less generous with their money, they move further to the right, and they become less willing to support the economic needs of all members of society. People in rich countries have been found to express less concern about their environmental impact.
And as the wealth gap widens, people at the two extremes become more and more distrustful of each other.
Most disturbing is that 'upper-class' individuals tend to behave more unethically than average citizens. Especially at the highest levels, where career success has been associated with Machiavellianism -- doing anything necessary to get ahead. A recent study of 261 U.S. senior professionals found that 21 per cent had clinically significant levels of psychopathic traits, compared to about one percent in the general population. That's roughly the same rate as for prisoners.