JONATHAN KING FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
The US missile attack on Syrian targets in April was a dangerous escalation of US military intervention in the Middle East. It was described by the White House and US State Department as a response to alleged use of chemical weapons by Syrian government forces in the town of Douma. In assessing the veracity of the US charges, it is useful to review some of the history of US claims of chemical and biological weapons attacks.
In 1981 Ronald Reagan's Secretary of State Alexander Haig charged the Soviet Union with using mycotoxins -- toxins produced by fungi -- in Southeast Asia, violating the Geneva Convention and Biological Weapons Convention. The State Department followed up with reports confirming attacks with mycotoxins and press reports appeared of interviews with Hmong residents claiming exposure to "yellow rain" which came down from the skies.
The Reagan administration used these charges to try to discredit the Soviet Union and also to increase the Pentagon budget for chemical and biological weapons research (always labeled as "defensive" programs).
KATHY KELLY FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Here in Kabul in early June, outside the home of several Afghan Peace Volunteers, a large drilling machine is parked on what was once a lovely garden. To this now muddy patch, workers will soon arrive for another noisy, dusty day of digging for water. The well dried up a week ago. As of today, the household has no water.
Ongoing battles between militants, government forces, and international allies have destroyed much of Kabul's water infrastructure, forcing people to drill their own wells.
Across Kabul, numerous households face similar water shortages. With an average annual rainfall of just fourteen inches, Kabul's water table has been falling each year. The current population, estimated around 4.5 million, is expected to reach 9 million by 2050. The estimated groundwater potential is enough to supply only 2 million inhabitants with water.
Alarming reports say that drought now afflicts twenty-one of Afghanistan's thirty-four provinces.
MATT NELSON AND ELISA BATISTA FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Facebook seems to be flailing in hot water these days for selling the personal data of more than 87 million US residents to now-defunct private marketing firm Cambridge Analytica. The firm in turn shared it with the Trump campaign and allegedly with Russians who used it for voter suppression campaigns.
We are also now well aware of the 3,000 political ads purchased by Russian operatives on fake Facebook political pages. And we've witnessed CEO Mark Zuckerberg try to convince Congress and Facebook users that the world's most popular social media platform takes the integrity of its product seriously and its responsibility for doing its part to uphold democracy with dead earnestness.
Regardless, more than 2 billion monthly users on all points of the political spectrum remain on Facebook because it has become such an effective tool for building communities, organizing events, and, yes, galvanizing users into political action.
So the company's answer to the question of how to mitigate the threat of Russian influence is at the very least puzzling as it corrodes the very ideal of enhancing and protecting democracy which it seeks to engender.
MEDEA BENJAMIN AND NICHOLAS J.S. DAVIES FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Former President Jimmy Carter has called U.S. politics a system of “legalized bribery” in which powerful interests spend billions of dollars on lobbying and campaign funding to ensure that members of Congress pay more attention to them than to the general public. With the upcoming midterm elections, we will see the full force of this tsunami of cash washing over our electoral system.
The human cost of this corrupt system has been searingly rammed home since the Parkland school shooting, as grieving high school students determined to curb America’s gun violence have found themselves in a pitched battle with the “gun lobby,” led by the National Rifle Association (NRA), one of the most entrenched and powerful interest groups in the country.
The gun lobby has already spent over $12 million on lobbying and given at least $1.1 million to members of Congress in this election cycle, 98% of it to Republicans. The gun lobby also wields power over Democrats through lobbying and public relations, and the threat of targeting individual Democrats who take a public stand for gun control.
But what about the even greater violence of America’s wars and the record military budget that makes them possible? U.S. weapons makers spend far more money on lobbying and campaign contributions than the domestic gun lobby: $162 million on lobbying and tens of millions in direct funding for members of Congress so far in the 2017-18 election cycle.
ROBERT C. KOEHLER FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
I don't blame all of the planet's ills on the Republican Party, but I find hope in the possibility that it's on the verge of collapse.
I'm not talking politics here. I'm talking deep vision of humanity: a sense of who we are and how we impact Planet Earth and all its occupants. A smallness of mind has a chokehold on American political power and awareness. Maybe what I mean is that it has control over the money.
"The money just isn't there" — to provide universal healthcare, to create environmental sustainability . . . to ensure that everyone has clean drinking water. I could name dozens more "nice ideas" that are financial impossibilities, relegated to the trash bin of wishful thinking. We all could.
JIM HIGHTOWER ON BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Question: If you inject a stream of raw ignorance into a vat of gaseous arrogance, then jolt the mixture with 1,000 megawatts of malevolence ... what does it produce? Answer: Donald Trump's Executive Order of April 12.
Let's start with the arrogance. King Donald the First has been in a deep pout over negative articles about him in the Washington Post newspaper, which is owned by Jeff Bezos, King of the Amazon.com empire. Trump has fired off several rounds of angry tweets assailing Bezos, including a potshot claiming that Amazon is ripping off the post office by underpaying for the millions of its packages that the postal services ships.
Well, tweets are one thing, but King Donald has the firepower of the federal government at his beck and call, so he is arrogantly using the government power to escalate his personal spat with Bezos. By executive order, he set up a federal task force to conduct a pernicious political inquisition into "our money losing post office," particularly looking at the "pricing of the package delivery market."
OLIVIA ROSANE OF ECOWATCH ON BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
A groundbreaking study by the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) is the first to map a pathway to limiting warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels without relying on negative emissions technologies that suck carbon dioxide from the the atmosphere, an IIASA press release reported.
Instead, the study published Monday in Nature Energy found that the more ambitious Paris agreement target can be reached through innovations in the energy efficiency of daily activities. Changes to heating, cooling, transport, appliances and technological devices could both limit climate change and meet the UN Sustainable Development Goals to improve quality of life in the global South, the study found.
"Our analysis shows how a range of new social, behavioral and technological innovations, combined with strong policy support for energy efficiency and low-carbon development can help reverse the historical trajectory of ever-rising energy demand," IIASA acting program director and lead study author Arnulf Grubler said in the press release.
LORRAINE CHOW OF ECOWATCH ON BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Volkswagen CEO Herbert Diess made the vow in a letter sent to the German branch of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA).
PETA publicized the announcement on Monday. The animal rights group said Volkswagen will "never again use animals in testing unless required to do so by law" and will include the new ban in company's code of conduct that will be updated later this year.
MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Sorting through Trump's bellowing and bombastic Twitter storms raises the question of whether there is any method to his lie-filled messages on social media. To many progressives, Trump appears to be acting more like a strident Fox News pundit than the president of the United States. However, some recent polling suggests that his brazen missives are working as an attempt to shore up his base.
According to a YouGov poll from May, for instance, 61 percent of Republicans answered "yes" to the question, "Do you believe Donald Trump is being framed by the FBI and the Department of Justice?" In contrast, only 7 percent of Democrats thought that Trump was being framed in the survey of 1,500 adults. Meanwhile only 14 percent of self-identified members of the GOP somewhat or strongly approve of Robert Mueller's investigation.
Although the YouGov poll is only a snapshot, it does offer credence to the theory that Trump is brashly sending calculated messages to his supporters. Although Trump's overall favorability ratings have recently hovered near 40 percent, the conservative site Town Hall ran a June 3 story touting Trump's high approval by the Republican rank and file as measured by Gallup. It was entitled, "Trump Has Second Highest 'Own Party' Presidential Approval Rating Since WWII at 500 Day Mark."
LORRAINE CHOW OF ECOWATCH FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
The world's richest countries continue to subsidize at least $100 billion a year in subsidies for the production and use of coal, oil and gas, despite repeated pledges to phase out fossil fuels by 2025.
The Group of Seven, or G7, consists of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the UK and the U.S. The group, as well as the larger G20, agreed as early as 2009 to phase out fossil fuels in order to combat climate change.
But a new report from Britain's Overseas Development Institute (ODI) reveals that on average per year in 2015 and 2016, the G7 governments supplied at least $81 billion in fiscal support and $20 billion in public finance, for both production and consumption of oil, gas and coal at home and overseas.
"With less than seven years to meet their 2025 phase-out deadline, G7 governments continue to provide substantial support the production and use of oil, gas and coal," the authors stated.