Facebook Slider


Optional Member Code
Get News Alerts!


clichangechildClimate change is hazardous to the health of children. (Photo: Environmental Illness Network)

We are not just leaving the legacy of a toxic and volatile environment to our children; we are negatively impacting them today.

In a recent article, the Inter Press Service (IPS) describes how young people are pushing back against adults' failure to take aggressive action to mitigate climate change:

In the United States, the 21 young people who are plaintiffs in the case Juliana v. United States will soon make their case against the government for failing to take action against climate change. Similar lawsuits have been filed in countries including Portugal, India, and Pakistan.

And in the 2017 Bonn climate change conference, a 12-year-old Fijian boy whose village had completely been devastated by cyclone linked to climate change, addressed negotiators and urged them to find solutions to the changing climate.

Sadly, these children are outliers and millions of their peers in other parts of the world, including children from sub-Saharan African countries, will never have the chance to tell the world how climate change harms them. All too often, children are the unseen victims of climate change.

However, the IPS notes that "children’s plight is not addressed by the major stakeholders in the climate change negotiations." Climate change is, according to IPS, something that adults will discuss, without the input of children.


Monopoly 0213wrp opt(Photo: Sean Davis / Flickr)Why does Donald Trump constantly preface his outlandish lies with such phrases as: "To be honest with you," "To tell the truth" and "Believe me"?

Because even he knows that as a lifelong con-man, his voice takes on the tone of a snake-oil salesman when he starts exaggerating and prevaricating, so he reflexively tries to puff up his credibility with an extra dose of bluster: "No really, trust me, I never lie..." In fact, just in the past year, Trump's documented whoppers rank him as the lyingest president in U.S. history. And that included Nixon!

It's not the volume of his fabrications that is so gross, but their enormity. Most damnable of all has been his masquerading as a golden-haired billionaire "populist" who's standing up for America's hard-hit middle class against Wall Street, corporate lobbyists and moneyed elites — a carefully crafted PR pose that has duped many working stiffs into thinking he is their champion.


Resist 0213wrp opt(Photo: Joe Flood / Flickr)While hypocrisy runneth over at the White House on numerous fronts, it is particularly glaring when it comes to the issue of immigration. However, thanks to Jennifer Mendelsohn, the woman behind the #resistancegenealogy movement, we know a lot more about the immigrant experiences of the families of some of the administration's – and their media acolytes' -- most strident anti-immigrant voices. And those histories are chock full of the very things the administration has been critical of, including so-called chain migration, the inability to speak English, and the coming to this country to seek work, any kind of work.

In a mid-January Politico piece, titled "How Would Trump's Immigration Crackdown Have Affected His Own Team?", Mendelsohn, a Baltimore, Maryland-based free-lance writer, discussed her work tracking the family histories of anti-immigrant advocates. To put her work in perspective, she cited a comment – that appeared in a 2016 Chicago Sun-Times editorial -- by immigration historian Tyler Anbinder: "From the days of the Puritans to the present, every generation of Americans has believed that the latest wave of immigrants is completely different from—and inferior to—their own immigrant ancestors and could never become true Americans."


War 0212wrp opt"War." (Photo: The Naked Ape / Flickr)While elected officials of our increasingly dysfunctional democracy debated "memogate," the world became more dangerous as Trump’s Nuclear Posture Review was officially released on Friday, February 2. Ignoring scientific studies of the past decade and growing global sentiment by the world's non-nuclear states to abolish nuclear weapons, with this announcement the new arms race begins and the Cold War resumes. 

Scientific studies have demonstrated the potential catastrophic global environmental effects following a limited regional nuclear war, using just 100 12-kiloton Hiroshima-size weapons (of the 16,300 in the arsenals of the nine nuclear nations, which is approximately one-half of just one percent) that would potentially kill two billion people.

This new Doctrine proposes the development of two new generations of nuclear weapons including "low-yield nukes," Submarine Launched Ballistic Missiles (SLBM) and the long-term development of Submarine Launched Cruise Missiles (SLCM). These "low-yield nukes" are 20 kt—same as the larger Nagasaki size bombs that killed more than 70,000 people. Seemingly ignoring the fact that nuclear weapons are nuclear weapons regardless of size with the same horrific initial devastation and radioactive fallout, these weapons are proposed to demonstrate America's resolve in deterring nuclear attack.


BarbFlag 0212wrp opt(Photo: Nick Pezzillo / Flickr)In 2015 it was reported that up to 50 million American adults had negative wealth and thus numbered among the poorest 10% of the world's adults. This was disputed by Vox writer Matthew Yglesias, who said, "..that's absurd. The poorest people in the world are the people with rock-bottom material living standards." 

It's difficult for many Americans to admit the truth about extreme poverty in our country. Our poorest citizens may not be living in a farming village where they eat millet soup and walk a mile for water. But they have to deal withhomelessness, alcoholism, mental health disease, opioid addiction, stress-inducing indebtedness and inequality, and pollution levels that are the highest in the developed world. All of that makes for rock-bottom living standards. 

According to Credit Suisse data over the past three years, anywhere from 4 to 10 percent of the world's poorest decile are Americans. That's 20 to 50 million adults. It's likely that many of them are only temporarily in debt, and that they have a much better chance than a third-world villager to climb out of poverty. But it's just as likely that they'll be replaced by other impoverished Americans, especially with an aging population woefully unprepared for retirement, and with the great majority of new job prospects temporary or contract-based, without security or benefits.


MLK 0209wrp opt(Photo: Scott Ableman / Flickr)The Ram ad in Sunday's Super Bowl has been widely denounced across left and liberal media for the use of a speech by Martin Luther King Jr. to sell a truck (even Fox News criticized the ad for not including MLK's advice to only buy affordable cars!).

The ad raised eyebrows, to say the least, among many viewers for the instrumentalization of Martin Luther King Jr.'s words for commercial purposes. This simple fact did not sit well with people, but it is hardly the first time King's words (and likeness) have been licensed to sell products. Today though people are increasingly discomfited by the use of one of the US's greatest civil rights icon to sell products, and that is surely a sign of progress.

More critical viewers perceived a deeper contradiction at work. King was an outspoken critic of consumerism and, even more explicitly in his later years, of capitalism more generally. The USA Today, Vox, HuffPost and others went further. They discovered that the specific speech used in the commercial actually included a direct criticism of manipulative advertising practices, especially those used to sell cars! Ram's creative marketing team conveniently left that part of the speech out of the commercial.

The above criticisms have echoed across social media -- and completely justifiably so. Ram's use of King's speech to sell a truck is a gross misrepresentation and misuse of one of the greatest Black icons in US history (despite the shocking fact that the company which manages the licensing for King's estate approved the final ad before it aired). But Martin Luther King Jr. was not simply a powerful advocate for civil rights. He was not only a critic of the harms of consumer capitalism. He was also one of the US's greatest antiwar leaders and practitioners of nonviolent resistance.


 putinvotingTrump should be more concerned about voting cybersecurity than cozying up to Putin. (Global Panorama)

Last November, at the Asia-Pacific summit, Donald Trump was eager to once again vouch for Vladimir Putin.

In this case, it was in regards to an issue hanging over the president's head like a Damocles sword: Did the Russian government interfere with the 2016 election? More specifically, it is a question of whether the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government to defeat Hillary Clinton in the electoral vote. However, Trump has been backing Putin's denial of any interference in the election, including hacking into state election systems, regardless of whether or not his campaign had knowledge of it.

Trump praises Putin and gives him the benefit of the doubt on a regular basis. Most recently, he even refused to enforce sanctions Congress had passed against Russia for, in part, interfering with the US elections. A CNN report from the November summit once again revealed Trump's abiding faith in the veracity of Putin.

Thursday, 08 February 2018 08:23

Trumped-Up Treason

President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with U.S. and Japanese Business Leaders at the U.S. Ambassador's residence, Monday, Nov. 6, 2017, in Tokyo. President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with US and Japanese Business Leaders at the US Ambassador's residence on November 6, 2017, in Tokyo. (Photo: US Embassy Tokyo)TOM H. HASTINGS FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

You don't need us to tell you about the corporate media's low standards. Help BuzzFlash and Truthout maintain a quality alternative to mainstream news -- make a donation now!

“Somebody said 'treasonous.' I mean -- yeah I guess, why not. Can we call that treason? Why not. I mean, they certainly didn't seem to love our country very much.” -- Donald Trump on Democratic Senators and Congress members who didn’t clap for him in his State of the Union speech.

Really? We have a temporary resident of the White House whose definition of loyalty to the United States of America is loyalty to, and expressed enthusiasm for, his boneheaded ideas and false claims of greatness? We would expect such autocratic monomaniacal pronouncements from Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong-un, Rodrigo Duterte, or any other egomaniac warlord. Hitler and Stalin were such demented oppressors. Saddam Hussein, Augusto Pinochet -- the anti-democratic autarchs are easy to name.

Brian Brown, President of World Congress of Families (WCF). Taken on the 27th of May, 2017. World Congress of Families XI. Budapest Congress Center. Hungary, Central Europe.Brian Brown president of World Congress of Families (WCF) on May 27, 2017, at the World Congress of Families XI. (Photo: Elekes Andor / Wikimedia)BILL BERKOWITZ FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

BuzzFlash and Truthout depend on reader support -- can you make a tax-deductible donation and help publish journalism with real integrity and independence?

Here is a sobering thought: Brian Brown, the notoriously anti-LGBTQ president of the National Organization for Marriage (NOM), recently penned a fundraising missive to his supporters, claiming the Supreme Court is just one retirement away from banning same-sex marriage. While Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has indicated that she has no plans to retire, Brown speculated that Justice Anthony Kennedy could soon announce his retirement and, in any case, "it's no secret that most of the liberal justices are quite elderly and the cold reality of life is that nobody lives forever."

Over the past year, Brown has been pummeling his supporters with fundraising appeals. According to Fred Karger's February 2017 piece in The Advocate, "NOM filed both of its 990 IRS tax returns late, late last year, and they showed that revenue is way down, to well under $4 million for the combined NOM and the NOM Education Fund. This is down 400 percent from just four years ago when NOM raised and spent over $16 million."


gerrymandering123Gerrymandering suppresses an inclusive democracy. (Photo: Victoria Pickering)

BuzzFlash and Truthout depend on reader support -- can you make a tax-deductible donation and help publish journalism with real integrity and independence?

Republican legislators have vigorously and successfully used underhanded tactics to gain majorities in statehouses and Congress, even when the majority of statewide votes are Democratic. Although the GOP employs many strategies to suppress non-white voting, its most successful tool has been gerrymandering.

After the national Census, state legislatures are responsible for carving up state legislative and congressional districts. In 2010, the cast was set, according to a revealing article in Salon about the way in which Republicans worked to ensure a majority in most statehouses and in Congress:

It [the redistricting strategy] proved more effective than any Republican dared dream. Republicans held the U.S. House in 2012, despite earning 1.4 million fewer votes than Democratic congressional candidates, and won large GOP majorities in the Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan and North Carolina state legislatures even when more voters backed Democrats.

By diluting the Democratic vote in several districts, while drawing the district lines to include more Republicans, an artificial majority can be created that mocks democracy.

The Republicans control both chambers in 36 statehouses. They have total control, including a GOP governor, in 26 states. Of course, they also have majority status in the House of Representatives.

Page 11 of 1523