 |
|||
| November 10, 2005 |
MAILBAG ARCHIVES | ||
The BuzzFlash Mailbag The opinions expressed in the Mailbag are not necessarily those of BuzzFlash. Read the BuzzFlash FAQ for info on submitting to the Mailbag. THIS IS PART 2 OF THE NOVEMBER 10, 2005 BUZZFLASH MAILBAG. CLICK HERE FOR PART 1 Subject: Use of the Term "Vote Fraud" Is a Harmful Frame Reference the Nov. 4, 2005 article, Vote Fraud Determines Elections, not Voter Fraud - Florida and Ohio Again? -- Ms. Smith Goes to Washington As many of us are learning, words can have a very powerful impact in trying to frame a political issue or debate. Certain political strategists have become masters at selecting the exact word(s) for the purpose of swaying public opinion on various issues. As an election reform activist, I have become very sensitive to the use of the term "voter fraud," i.e., fraud perpetrated by the voters themselves, when in fact the correct term for the 2000 and 2004 elections, at least, should be "election fraud." While there is a subtle difference between the terms "vote fraud" and "voter fraud," they are close enough that most people would interpret the terms as being one and the same. Those who have corrupted our election system have been trying to steer public opinion and policy away from the REAL issue, that of massive election fraud through problematic electronic election systems, electronic manipulation of the results through proprietary software, etc., as well as old-fashioned voter disenfranchisement. Instead, all blame for any "perceived" election problems has been called "voter fraud." The result, of course, has been efforts across the country for voter I.D. and other methods that will make it more difficult for voters to vote, while the real problems go largely unaddressed by the politicians. I therefore encourage everyone writing about this issue to reconsider the use of the misleading term of "vote fraud." I would urge to instead use "election fraud" or some other term that frames the issue better and more accurately. Thank you. Beth E. Peterson Subject: Birthday Wishes Many brave Marines have given life or limb to preserve the freedoms we have in America. I lost a few good friends and comrades during the Viet Nam War, and I shall miss them and remember them always. I'm proud to have served as a Navy Corpsman with the 3rd Marine Division during Viet Nam. To those who have served in the Marine Corps or are serving now, to those who have family members and friends who proudly serve or have served in "the Corps," I wish our Corps a Happy 230th Birthday. To all veterans who have served faithfully to make America free, may your service and sacrifices be remembered and honored tomorrow, Veteran's Day, 2005. http://www.edwards.af.mil/archive/2003/... Semper Fi! Tom Thorne Subject: Chemical Warfare in Iraq I have now heard discussions about the use of a napalm-like substance in the Fallujah fighting. The report was based on Italian reports and videos and mentioned bodies with strange burns and destroyed flesh, but much less or no damage to clothing. Everybody says it doesn't really sound like napalm-like stuff. But, being something of an amateur chemist I think I have a clue. Any really basic material can dissolve flesh and will have little affect on cotton or acrylics. Lime is one basic material that does this kind of thing somewhat slowly. Other bases can do it faster, like sodium hydroxide and calcium hydroxide. They are something like acids in their effect. They work by "stealing" hydrogen ions from compounds and forming water with them and can work very fast to destroy proteins. I wonder if anyone else has any ideas. It would be interesting if someone could get tissue samples for analysis. Then we could have real facts. This idea of looking at pictures isn't optimal. Lee [BuzzFlash Note: We can't evaluate the above theory, but this government source indicates that when white phosphorus/felt is burned, it forms oxides that react with air moisture to form acids.] Subject: "For LI GOP, the end of an ERA" LI was a republican stronghold for 80 years.....it's over. Watch Tom Suozzi, Nassau county executive....an EXTRAORDINARY politician. For LI GOP, end of an era (Newsday) T. Friedman Subject: Bill Maher Says it Best ... And a Great Short Letter to Newsday's Editor Bill Maher, "Real Time with Bill Maher," on the protests during President Bush's visit to Argentina:
Mary Subject: If you thought Lindsay Graham cared about the people we torture, read this Wednesday : November 09, 2005 Sen. Graham Introduces Amendment to End Habeas for Detainees Breaking: Senator Lindsay Graham is introducing an Amendment to the defense appropriations bill pending in the Senate (S. 1042) that would strip those designated by the Administration as enemy combatants of the ability to seek habeas review in federal courts. This is an end-run around the Supreme Court's decision in Rasul v. Bush which held Guantanamo detainees have the right to challenge the legality of their detentions. According to Graham's talking points for the bill (which I received by e-mail) his amendment would prohibit detainees from using the court to challenge: The legality of their detentions The propriety of returning detainees to their home countries Adequacy of medical care at Guantanamo Quality of the food Speed of mail delivery Allotment of exercise time and other conditions of confinement You can read the text of his amendment here. (pdf) (scroll down, the first page is blank.) This would effectively end all litigation brought on behalf of the detainees at Guantanamo Bay, as well as any future litigation on behalf of those imprisoned at the CIA secret detention camps. This bill is intended to have retroactive application. Please call your senators as soon as possible and urge them to vote against the Graham amendment. http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm The Center for Constitutional Rights is urging bloggers to get the message out that Graham's amendment needs a swift defeat. Please, do your part. http://www.ccr-ny.org/v2/reports/report.asp?ObjID=tNs7RqrFSC&Content=660 Karen Webb Subject: former dem federal prosecutor ousts 30 year rep DA on LI Dennis Dillon was anti abortion and his views became controversial many times over the years. Ms. Rice brought choice into the campaign, and it might have swung the vote. Dillon's loss is a true humiliation for the GOP. Rookie of the year (Newsday) T. Friedman Subject: Larry Beinhart
This single statement says more about why the rest of the world hates the US than anything else. The rest of the world has been dragged screaming and kicking into an understanding of war crimes by the years of diplomatic work at the UN and elsewhere from 1945 to 1999. Pinochet knows it, the Nazis knew it, Milosevic is learning it. Now it is time for the students to teach the teacher. Americans have forgotten that the existence of their country is based primarily on a hatred and distrust of governments. "We the people ..." and all the rest that followed back in the good old days was all about putting the individual above the government that he had to live with (not live under). A government can be likened to excrement - it seems to be a necessary product of life that is by definition unpleasant and unhealthy if one is not very careful when dealing with it. I believe this is what the founding fathers understood when they created the Constitution and Bill of Rights. They were trying to ensure that individuals could control the government, not that the government could control the people. They did not want the governments deified and particularly did not want office holders to be above the law, since their job was to deal competently with the excrement of life in a republic. Impeachment was built in from the beginning to curb would-be dictators. I would submit that Americans have become very lazy, and hence the bad guys have been allowed to render the impeachment concept into some sort of ultimate obscenity, when it was intended to merely be the standard slap in the face and reprimand for the crooks who would inevitably be attracted to government office (hey, it beats working). Impeachment is the speeding ticket to control out-of-control presidents. If Americans could regain the healthy contempt for governments and the type of people who run for office in the richest country on earth, they might more easily see that the US has committed de facto war crimes in going into Iraq. The US is also a nation devoted to secret torture chambers, secret surveillance of citizens, arbitrary detention and imprisonment without access to counsel or public trial and many other little bits of unpleasantness which were supposed to be cleaned up by the exercise of democracy under the US Constitution. If you don't like this vision in your mirror, maybe it's time to haul out the old impeachment cure and regain control of your government. Nobody else can do it for you. DJ Subject: A Winning Message for the Dems This week's elections indicate a gaping and growing hole in the GOP agenda. Messages based on principle and the belief that we the people are all equal behind the curtain of a legitimate voting booth, will resonate with the voters. Our message should be as follows: That while the defense of our shores and strategic alliances will best protect our country, the defense of our environment is nearly equal in importance. That vision is needed to prepare for the post-oil era, and those that think in both the present and future timelines are vital to the military and economic future and security of America. That there are those among us who are poor, underfed, and without healthcare, is a moral and christian disgrace, and that a country without compassion is a country without passion. That we tolerate the ignoring of millions of our children and elderly, (our future and our storied past), can not and must not be allowed to continue. That we continually reject increases in the minimum wage, allow unions and pension plans to be decimated for the benefit of the wealthiest, and seek to destroy public lands at the behest of corporate greed, show our leadership to be the most anti-family party in our history. That we can sleep at night knowing that in our name we torture and kill is inconceivable. That we can ignore treaties and start wars of choice, and seek out support from our allies is pure folly. That we can ignore science and the truths it holds harkens back to more intolerant times. That the MSM still refuses to hold our leaders accountable is an affront to the requirement for a free and unfettered press. We need to stand tall, respect our myriad individual spirituality and religious beliefs, and stand taller against the intrusion of religion into our courts. We need to be better because we can be better. America can still hold the promise of a living wage balanced against the need for strong corporations. We can and we must. We must return to our roots and demand a republic based on sound, legal, and just redistricting, states rights, and the singular right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. We can and we must. And we must always remember why our parents and grandparents came to our shores: Because we are the beacon of fairness, equality, civil rights, individual freedom, and a citizen democracy. I too have a dream. Maybe these last elections portend hope. Frank J. Saccone, Jr. Subject: A Gentleman's Agreement with Judith Miller All the buzz about Judith Miller makes me wonder. The Church Committee revealed in 1976 that the CIA was actively influencing all media in this country and abroad (google: Operation Mockingbird), and the Church Committee at that time secured a sort of "gentleman's agreement" with then CIA Director G. H. W. Bush: "February 11, 1976, CIA Director George [H. W.] Bush announced new guidelines governing the Agency's relationship with United States media organizations: "Effective immediately, CIA will not enter into any paid or contractual relationship with any full-time or part-time news correspondent accredited by any U.S. news service, newspaper, periodical, radio or television network or station.""[Final Report of the Select Committee to Study Government Operations With Respect to Intelligence Activities (April, 1976)] Of course it's easy to think of 1,000 ways to seduce journalists without a formal contract, signed and notarized. There is the romance of considering one's self as a sort of 'James Bond' (cf. Christopher Hitchins), there is the access to contacts in high government places as sources for one's articles (the ultimate job security for a journalist), there is the confidence of knowing you'll always have some kind of highly paid job through the CIA's network of large international corporations who are too happy to repay favors, and there is the warm and fuzzy thought that, if something goes wrong and you are put in jail, John Bolton will bring you a teddy bear. And on and on. It had probably been difficult to enforce those signed CIA contracts, anyway. Therefore it is difficult to believe that this kind of thing is not still going on (buzzflash.com excepted, of course), even when we are not showered with stories of Judith Miller et al. at the New York Times, and others at Fox, CBS, Reader's Digest, etc. The Church Committee report describes the dangers: "Domestic "Fallout": The Committee finds that covert media operations can result in manipulating or incidentally misleading the American public. Despite efforts to minimize it, CIA employees, past and present, have conceded that there is no way to shield the American public completely from "fallout" in the United States from Agency propaganda or placements overseas. Indeed, following the Katzenbach inquiry, the Deputy Director for Operations issued a directive stating: "Fallout in the United States from a foreign publication which we support is inevitable and consequently permissible.". . ."The domestic fallout of covert propaganda comes from many sources: books intended primarily for an English-speaking foreign audience; CIA press placements that are picked up by an international wire service; and publications resulting from direct CIA funding of foreign institutes. For example, a book written for an English-speaking foreign audience by one CIA operative was reviewed favorably by another CIA agent in the New York Times. The Committee also found that the CIA helped create and support various Vietnamese periodicals and publications. In at least one instance, a CIA supported Vietnamese publication was used to propagandize the American public and the members and staff of both houses of Congress. So effective was this propaganda that some members quoted from the publication in debating the controversial question of United States involvement in Vietnam." [Final Report of the Select Committee to Study Government Operations With Respect to Intelligence Activities (April, 1976)] Many people are still mystified at this point about the source of the "yellowcake document," which has so far been traced to the Italian counterpart (and cohorts) to the CIA. Duh. The "yellowcake document" obviously fits under the category in the Church Committee report called, "domestic fallout of covert propaganda." However this is a new development in the sense that it was covert propaganda intentionally produced to provide intended fallout here in our country: WAR. A line has been crossed. The Church Committee determined the danger to our democracy of "contractual obligations" by media figures with the CIA. Someone needs to point out the dangers of our current system of journalists' 'gentlemen's agreements' with the CIA, which in this case has cost us the lives of thousands of Americans and tens of thousands of Iraqis, and more to come: Syria, Iran. . . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOCKINGBIRD http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_Committee T. R. Phillips Subject: We Do Not Torture Bush said it in South America and Panama. International audiences, from Economic Summit, and they heard his words all over the world. USA TODAY headline 11-8-05: Bush - “We do not torture.” Page 6A “Five soldiers charged with abuse of Iraq prisoners.” Pictures shown all over the world of abuse. Female to prison for torture. Two soldiers in prison awaiting trial for killing an Iraq General by Beating and Suffocation. Several soldiers are in prison awaiting trial for Torture of Iraqis. 37 prisoners died in our military prisons. Some brutally beaten. What is wrong? How can the President of The United States make such a statement that is well known to be Wrong? On International TV where millions heard him and know he is LYING! Did he lie? Or, is it just he did not know better? He was out of the loop? He does not watch TV. He only reads headlines of newspapers. Did his staff keep POW pictures from him? He is kept out of the White House on vacation or speaking to his choir. The Iraq Group—Cheney and Rumsfeld spread the lies to War without his knowledge. His answer was not scripted so it could have been he did not know the truth. This is a horrible mistake for all Americans. The President of the United States goes on International TV and says something millions of viewers know to be false. This statement will rank alongside –-Tonkin Gulf attack—I did not swap arms for hostages—I did not have sex with that woman Miss Lewinsky—We have excellent proof they have WMD. AMERICA HAS BEEN SHAMED BEFORE THE WORLD. Clarence Swinney Subject: Mainstream Media Doing the White House Bidding Again Hi Buzz: Yesterday, Lou Dobb's questions of the day was, "Is it time for a third political party?" Today MSNBC's question is the same and 71% replied yes. Don't you think a 'third party' might be the only way the Republicans may win in the coming elections? Gosh, I wonder if old Nader will pop onto the scene again? Dividing the Democratic voters is what this is all about. All Bush has left is his loony base that will never leave him, so why suddenly this talk of a third party? Watch out, Rove and the boys are always planning. They are putting out their floaters & soon the mainstream media will all be pushing their propaganda. Marlene Subject: Amtrak Board Release Gunn
Gunn came out of retirement in May 2002 to lead Amtrak after a career that included running transit systems in New York and Washington, D.C. The strategic plan produced by Amtrak's Board and management calls for fundamental change with the goal of delivering better service for passengers and an improving financial performance. The plan calls for competition in U.S. rail passenger service, shared federal-state financial responsibility for passenger rail, as is the case with highways and aviation, and predictable multi-year federal funding. A report released last week by the Government Accountability Office credited Amtrak's management with some positive changes in recent years, but also was uncharacteristically blunt in concluding that more far-reaching changes were needed along the lines of those proposed by Amtrak's Board. I was just wondering why there was no news about the Amtrak President being fired? I heard on the Ed Schultz show yesterday that he was fired because he would do what the Bush Administration wanted? I have not heard anything anywhere else about this. Do you have any news on this? Thanks, Pat [BuzzFlash Note: Reuters' story: Amtrak axes chief executive: Gunn is fired after clashes with the Bush administration over the future of national rail service (money.cnn)] Subject: Humanity and Pollution! The Republicans are hot on the trail of the “bad guy” who told the media about the existence of the secret prisons, even one Senator suspecting one of his GOP cronies did the deed. After all the investigations the Repubs have blocked, they want this one! However, their outrage DOES NOT extend to these CIA hell holes around the world. Their concern also falls short of humans being illegally detained, some without charges. Instead of being bothered by who “leaked,” why are they NOT worried about the methods of torture and abuse of terror suspects or the many counts of war crimes committed by us against the Geneva Convention rules. They also do not want the UN committee or other human watch groups to interview detainees at Guantanamo! Why are they NOT looking into the secret prisons themselves? Of course, their secret prison story will divert attention from Bush’s Treasongate problems, and questions about Bush, Rove and Cheney and who knew what, when. The Republicans don’t seem to be too concerned about ALL THOSE who are responsible for “leaking” and “outing” a CIA Agent! Magna Charta “To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny, or delay right or justice!” Rachel Carson {“Silent Spring”} stated, “Genetic deterioration through man-made {chemical and radioactive} agents is the menace of our time, “the last and greatest danger to our civilization!”
Download English version at: http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/inchiesta/body.asp More about the film from the “Truthout” website:
We cannot let the Bush Administration get away with one outrage after another in matters of the environment and humanity. They tout “moral values” but their actions and policies are less then virtuous, and show little concern for the world. The world has noticed!! Americans must maintain proper concern for the welfare of others not only for our country, but for all humanity. Too many Bush policies have shamed and outraged us and we MUST speak out now! If we don’t, then as Salman Rushdie said, “Shame is like everything else; live with it for long enough and it becomes part of the furniture!” Susan Carr I don't know *who* you are (name, etc.) but you absolutely are one of the most hilarious writers I've seen in ages. The paramecium remark is so funny (although the subject itself isn't funny, I realize). A BuzzFlash Reader Subject: U.S. Reports Iraqi Civilian Casualties in Anti-Insurgent Sweep (NY Times) The Bushies must be REALLY frightened if they begin telling some truth... and the NYT is right there to do it for them.... A BuzzFlash Reader Subject: Pardons, Past and Future On Christmas Eve 1992 George Herbert Walker Bush bestowed presidential pardons on government officials alleged to be involved in subverting the Constitution of the United States. These pardons put an abrupt end to Special Prosecutor Lawrence Walsh's Iran-Contra investigation, a six-year, $40 million study of possible treason at the highest ranks of the Reagan-Bush administration. Ronald Reagan said he remembered nothing. Vice President George HW Bush said he was "out of the loop." In the last month of his tenure President George HW Bush pardoned six high officials in the Reagan administration: Elliott Abrams, National Security Advisor Robert McFarlane, Alan Fiers, Jr., Clair George, Duane Clarridge, and Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger. The latter two were pardoned before they went to trial. These six pardons abruptly ended Walsh's investigation, and guaranteed that neither George HW Bush nor Ronald Reagan would ever face further questioning about their involvement in the Iran-Contra scandal. Then George HW Bush issued Executive Order #12356 permanently sealing from public disclosure all records produced as a result of the Iran-Contra hearings. Of the six he had pardoned George HW Bush said: "The common denominator of their motivation - whether their actions were right or wrong - was patriotism." There was a brief flurry of outrage, Walsh wrote a book no one read and that was that. Fruit seldom falls far from the tree. Bush the Younger will issue pardons, for the same reasons as his father. The only question is when, not if. John Roberts [BuzzFlash Note: Sen. Reid and others did issue a statement challenging Bush not to issue a pardon. Dems press Bush to rule out Libby pardon (AP/CHicago Sun Times).] Subject: Kansas & Intelligent Design Sigh -- here we go again. The Kansas Board of Education mandates that public schools must teach "intelligent design" as a part of its curriculum. Will they also mandate that Christian Sunday Schools include evolution? Somehow I doubt it. Lisa J. Subject: An Email Exchange with The New York Times Editors-- Having watched the recent Italian documentary about the US military's chemical-weapon massacre of Fallujah, as well as reading numerous new articles in the blogosphere, I decided to write The New York Times, asking them why they still haven't even touched upon the subject. What I got in return from them was just shameful. Folks, THIS is what we are up against with the National Paper of Record, and it ain't pretty. Rather than trying to cram it all in this limited comment field, I have chosen to send you the link of the contents of this email exchange. I had sent the email "conversation" (if you can even call it that--- check out the NYT editor's responses to see what I mean) to another site, which neatly put it all together for easy reading: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/exchangewiththetimes.html A BuzzFlash Reader Subject: Asheville Heads Up Hey! You guys really have to take a trip down here to North Carolina sometime; I think you'd be surprised. While it's cool that Asheville elected its first black woman mayor, if you took a trip to Asheville, you'd realize that that's not at all unusual. Asheville is as progressive a city as you'd find in the "bluest" of "blue states," replete with lefty book stores, brew pubs, and vegetarian restaurants. I really enjoy BuzzFlash, but sometimes I think you guys are under the impression that all of us that live below the Mason Dixon line are a bunch of backwards rubes, bring dragged kicking and screaming into the 21st century by the far more forward thinking Northern progressive movement. Give us some credit, for crying out loud! Vern Dowdall Subject: Re: Thursday Morning's Top BuzzFlash Headlines Hi- a couple of things relating to today's headlines. 1. Polls tanking: al Qaida hand-in-glove thang. It is in no way surprising to we members of the Don't have our heads Up our Butts Class. The busheviks have had such a "licky" run of "coincidences, no? Anyway, You are aware that Keith Olbermann of MSNBC has been on the "I'm just saying - coincidence -distraction" issue. Far as I know, the only MSM outlet to talk of this stuff. Beat that drum! 2. I've sent this note (below) to a couple of other places. Hey - ya never know. This could be worth digging into. ........................ Just read the NYT piece on Abramoff and the 'fees" he collected from Gabon to hook up a meeting between G's President Bongo and gwb. The story got me wondering: is Joe Wilson anywhere in that story? Maybe. Oil? Most likely. I have often wondered whether the huge attack on Wilson and his wife had to do with more than the affaire de Niger. Could Wilson have information about dirty dealings in other areas? Like corruption and bribery involving fancy Washingtonian lobbyists and the White House? What does Wilson know about the cabal that they don't want him to talk about? A quick Dogpile search confirmed my recollection that Joe Wilson had connections with Gabon as a former Ambassador there. Read the piece I have linked below from a site called Lincolnblawg. Dunno anything about this blog but everything is pretty well linked to source material. No idea if this means a danged thing but it might, non? Just seems that, with some research, one could find some stuff that might be interesting. Too, that Wilson's former involvement in that region nor of Bongo's past efforts to work with Washington were mentioned in the NYT article makes me think there could be something in there. Maybe something that would make people want to drop the 200lb sh*thammer on Wilson? Dunno if this is a worthwhile rabbit hole but what the hell. I'm just sayin'.
Hilary Subject: The Vallely bulls**t is spreading! I hate to say I warned people, but I warned you! This is exactly how the Swift Boat ass***es started out. I guarantee that within a month, Gen. Vallely will be all over the networks, and cable news stations peddling his bullshit about Joe Wilson. Simply posting about it once or twice isn't going to cut it. We need to be on this vigilantly. http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=Maj.+Gen.+Paul+Vallely+ Hesiod Subject: The Time Has Come Buzzflash: I am writing you from the storm effected areas of SE Louisiana because the time for action is upon us. Our state and local economies have been completely devastated by the hurricanes and the industry in our state is all but gone. We've over half a million people who are now unemployed and the areas that were spared damage from the storms are now trying to deal with a massive population shift that has and will continue to cause many problems. The Bush administration has failed us. This incompetent, unqualified, miserable excuse for leadership has used arrogance and intimidation to push its self-serving, brain dead agenda to the point that it now threatens the fabric of this great nation. This administration has lied to the American People and has demonstrated time and again that they are totally incapable of managing the affairs of the United States. Criminal indictments, war provoking lies, and the pitiful way that they have represented this country to the world are a mere drop in the bucket. The Bush administration has run the U.S. economy into the ground and, with the incredible magnitude of the recent storms, the deficit can only grow. The time has come for the U.S. Congress and the American people to take action. We must find a way to deal with this administration before they deliver this great nation into ultimate peril. I challenge the American people to do whatever they can do to hold the Bush administration to account. Call your elected members of the U.S. Congress and tell them that the American people are unsatisfied and demand change. Write editorials to your local papers and start recall petitions immediately. I also challenge the U.S. Congress to take a stand against this Bush administration and hold them to account now. The nation cannot handle three more years of this sorry governance. I challenge the U.S. Congress to investigate this administration and impeach them for the crimes, manipulation, and secrecy that they have arrogantly shoved down the throats of the congress and the American people. The time has come for this U.S. Congress to read the writing on the wall; put aside partisanship; and do what has to be done in order to save the United States of America from the clutches of a president who is very obviously unqualified and incapable. I hereby call upon the U.S. Congress to give the American people the opportunity to elect a president who can repair the damage that this administration has done before it is more than the United States can recover from. Do these things that I've challenged you to, and it is possible that we can salvage our great nation from its doom. Allow this lousy, double-talking, high and mighty administration to remain in power, and they will destroy this nation. The time has come for all Americans and the U.S. Congress to preserve democracy, save our economy, and bandage the bloody wounds that this administration has inflicted upon our glorious homeland. It is no longer about democrats and republicans; now it is about Americans. Sacrifice this administration and save America. A BuzzFlash Reader
|
|||
| back to top | |||