Grifting the Taxpayers. Forget Church-State Separation: US Government To Pay Pastors' Salaries With Relief Funding

April 10th 2020

 
President Donald J. Trump, joined by Vice President Mike Pence, participates in the ceremonial swearing-in of the Jovita Carranza (Official White House Photo by Tia Dufour)

President Donald J. Trump, joined by Vice President Mike Pence, participates in the ceremonial swearing-in of the Jovita Carranza (Official White House Photo by Tia Dufour)

By Kerry Eleveld

Daily Kos

Well, here's something we didn't know was part of the $2 trillion federal relief package: a provision that makes it possible for some of that relief money to be directed toward religious institutions, according to NPR.

That's right, churches and other faith-based organizations have been designated within the legislation as "businesses," making them eligible to receive a portion of the $350 billion dedicated to helping small businesses weather tough economic times. Those are taxpayer dollars, folks, going to help faith-based organizations pay their pastors and utility bills.

Please support BuzzFlash financially if you want to help defeat Donald Trump. Click here to keep BuzzFlash exposing Trump's corruption, enabling of Coronavirus spread, and the dismantling of democracy.

"Faith-based organizations are eligible to receive SBA loans regardless of whether they provide secular social services," the SBA said in a statement. "No otherwise eligible organization will be disqualified from receiving a loan because of the religious nature, religious identity, or religious speech of the organization."

This seems a pretty clear-cut flouting of the Constitution. The First Amendment reads, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." 

"The government cannot directly fund inherently religious activities," Alison Gill, legal and policy vice president of American Atheists, told NPR. "It can't spend government tax dollars on prayer, on promoting religion [or] proselytization. That directly contradicts the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. This is the most drastic attack on church-state separation we have ever seen."

But religious advocates say the Supreme Court has been increasingly willing to look the other way on direct funding of religious entities. "In the last 15 years, the Court has moved increasingly in a permissive direction," says John Inazu, who specializes in religion and law at Washington University in St. Louis' School of Law.

The SBA appears to be headed in that direction too, saying that some of its own regulations "impermissibly exclude" religious organizations. 

"Because those regulations bar the participation of a class of potential recipients based solely on their religious status, SBA will decline to enforce these subsections and will propose amendments to conform those regulations to the Constitution," the SBA said. 

Wow. That seems like a pretty major policy change.

Continue the conversation at the BuzzFlash Nation group on Facebook.

Posted with permission